Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
翻拍里少有的没国籍痕迹的。有哭有笑，少年们，冲！
啊~ 真是纯净怡人~沁人心脾啊~ 如春风拂面，如夏日凉风，如秋果多汁，如冬日暖阳~~ 运动+青春+励志+美少年，太会了吧~导演你究竟去哪里找了这么多可爱帅气萌萌哒还会演戏的nobody啊！PS.最近自己在练习游泳，因此大概能想象到演员们一定付出了很多很多努力！
虽然总有着一股油腻感，以及一贯的输出靠吼的情感表达方式来弥补表演和剧本的功力不足，但我终于在国产青春片里感受到了年轻和热血
张伟和哪吒的那一次对望，众多隐喻仿佛从那对接的目光迸发而出，思绪万端，感慨万千。
难得看到一部这么中二又热血的青春电影，虽然是改编日本的，真希望以后多一点这样的剧……
无数次想象自己淹没人海中，偶尔会觉得自己也与众不同
可能是今年豆瓣评分最被过誉的国产电影，如果日版可以打90分，那翻拍版只能打20分，本土化改编不成功，人物动机、剧情起承转合毫无逻辑可言，最后一场本该高潮和热血的戏，只剩一个字「尬」。
最后，最后的表演很精彩。
再闯入茫茫人海中 ，做着平凡的梦，
再小的光芒也终会闪耀照亮，
。近几年中国怎么总是翻拍日本和韩国的电影？
看的好舒服啊，青春大男孩们+夏日泳池，看完觉得这个夏天真的结束了～
没那些乱七八糟的事，拍出了男孩子青春热血和可爱
看完这部才补了日本原版，觉得本土化的相当成功，故事兼顾了5个男孩的塑造，不像原版只塑造了妻夫木聪一个。情节虽然刻意的戏剧冲突明显，但故事很青春蓬勃还不狗血。这个世界更多的是不上不下的普通人，没有那么多极端的好或坏。怎么努力都不能成功的点真的挺戳
队长独自练习蹦床到最终突破自己佛系性格这段是高光
因为排片率低，导演在直播随机pk，宣传电影。太难了，青春片真的太难了🏊
2、10月2日看完了，我觉得本地化很不错，因为日本原版根本搬不过来，哈哈哈！泳池欧派那必须没法copy。高飞是潜力股可以持续关注。张伟同学表情还是需要再练练，寸头更帅。王子同学剃了光头反差很大。1、预告不错，希望正片不要拉垮。日版真的很精彩，希望翻牌能本土又搞笑。（竟然已经过去20年了……）
张伟一个人在泳池的场景仅次于最后团体花游的场面了
开始虽然有点强行搞笑，但还是欢乐的，中段开始找教练后，觉得鸡汤味儿就上来了。
国庆档和国产青春里的惊喜之作！整个作品青春洋溢热血沸腾，“我很普通，但我就是想要被看见”！主线的故事和主旨很明朗，几个男生之间的感情自然又纯粹，看到他们为着同一个目标前进的感觉真好；王子剃发那段真的给我哭崩了，张伟哭得美感崩坏，但也正是他真实的情感流露。最后的花游表演很美很燃，怎么还会有人拿它跟「燃野」比呢？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
