Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
2、影片正视游戏，将游戏当成竞技，对游戏的诠释也不是泛泛而谈，“有能力就赢，没能力就输呗，输了大不了再重开一局，赢了呢，你就会忘掉暂时的不开心和烦恼，可是那些不开心和烦恼马上就会回来，所以你就不停的再打一局…”，难能可贵的是既道出游戏黑幕，对资本加以嘲讽；又表现出电竞的残酷性和不被常人所理解——“胜者能赢钱得名；输家则被指玩物丧志，一事无成”。
出乎意料！真人吃鸡的时候细节做的很好，游戏外的剧情虽然老套但是也有亮点，这应该是电竞题材里的标杆了。
WFH一個月了，看到最後，突然斷網。
女主太美。借用女主的一句台词：活命很重要，保持人性更重要
平底锅，永远的神！！！
游戏场景还原，剧情也不落俗套，作为网大真的很良心了
完成度挺高的，没想到能还原游戏这么完整，感情戏推进的还是有点瑕疵。
在和游戏的联动上有些许创新，但是故事内核还是屌丝yy那套~6.5
把家庭问题最终归结为钱的问题，倒是简单粗暴。
Je vais ancrer tout ça dans ma mémoire pour toujours.
片子确实还行，在网大里。营销砸得是真猛。8月6号下午4点上线，晚上才一两百打分，就给开了个8.3，这要没点啥真说不过去。
从一个比较轻松愉快的描述疫情隔离，十分法国。谁能想到2022年看的时候我的小区也还是在封闭式管理的呢
确实挺好的！但也坚定了我对网大的看法，没有人物。
什么时候用喜剧把这段经历说出来，应该就结束了
紧跟时事的电影，看得出来编剧想把各行各业的居家百态都囊括在这一栋单元楼中。L'ambition se voit dans le film.
开始的时候以为是喜剧 结尾却看哭了。喜欢法国电影，用看似轻松的模式去描述一件悲伤的事情
2、影片正视游戏，将游戏当成竞技，对游戏的诠释也不是泛泛而谈，“有能力就赢，没能力就输呗，输了大不了再重开一局，赢了呢，你就会忘掉暂时的不开心和烦恼，可是那些不开心和烦恼马上就会回来，所以你就不停的再打一局…”，难能可贵的是既道出游戏黑幕，对资本加以嘲讽；又表现出电竞的残酷性和不被常人所理解——“胜者能赢钱得名；输家则被指玩物丧志，一事无成”。
需要这样的小电影， though the ending of it still reveals how COVID-19 have inflicted on us.
我自己基本从来不玩游戏，但不得不给这部满分。因为这种片子只有年轻导演能够完成，它代表着一种流行文化被影像化，这种完成度在世界范围内也是屈指可数的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
