Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
最后杀人就杀人，哪里那么磨磨叽叽。除了人物的名字变了,这一部和第一部有什么区别
（都怪尖笑 我真的很难入戏）
前半段还好，动作戏有来有回的，不再是出刀秒杀，但后面又变成话痨反派了，逃不了好莱坞套路
弱智到发笑，电影院里响起了此起彼伏的笑声，我怀疑这是一个喜剧片…
挺棒的，当观众已熟知惊声尖叫的套路时该怎么拍呢，当然是喜剧元素拉满。里面各种解构反讽各类恐怖片和其自身而让我作为恐怖片迷看得很开心。但这就导致凶手的确好猜而且动机让人捉急，所以扣一分
“欢迎来到第三幕！”
多次对恐怖片惯用手法的戏谑，以及在故事中影迷本身对“血腥刺杀”的倾覆与再创作，影片在实际的创作形式与内容上，实则是一次对自身的解构到重组。
惊声尖笑，你这个万恶之源，害得我现在看到这个面具就想笑，根本没办法好好看下去了。不过巴巴杜克确实别这个系列好看
【2月【🟢】【➊】】【2022 ▲ 128】【《惊声尖叫》·系列 第5部 作品】【≈ 114分钟】【原版 ★ 中文字幕】【⭐】◀▶【⭐⭐⭐】
这玩意也开始玩情怀了？杀手动机我是真的没看明白
可以理解为官方玩梗了，不停的吐槽ip的前作，各种刨坑挖梗还挺好玩的；粉丝向很重，如果没看过前作或者像我这样忘的差不多了，看起来会很傻
（可是Netflix上只有惊声尖笑啊
依然是悬念+血腥的模式，一贯的无脑与BUG集合，反派总是话痨，正派总是人多势众，却不知反抗，而且重要的一点，击倒了反派后，不会顺势施加伤害，限制其行动能力，或者让坏人就此死亡。时隔这么多年后，重启这个系列，并非明智之举。
还可以的，唯一问题是总觉得凶手脱了面具就变弱了
3.5，回归原点的粉丝向作品，能玩的梗全玩了一遍。原版四部+mtv两季，这部正好对应stab7，是不是系列要完结啦🙁
中规中矩，算是合格吧，看样子系列大概率终结！
114分钟18秒 23.976fps 蓝光 其实这是一部指控好莱坞为了赚钱猛拍续集的续集电影
前四部都是在寝室和室友边吐槽边看的，这部竟然还不错
情懷滿分呀，我一開始就猜到Amber是殺手之一。我覺得嘛，唯一的rule是：要殺就趕快殺，一旦廢話多就被反殺。
无限套娃自我解构确实是个还算可行的续集思路。东亚少女能把白男警长干翻有点太离谱了，咱力气能有这么大的话夜里出门就该是黑哥哥绕着咱走了：）
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
