Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
今天在中国电影博物馆3厅，早上第一场：10：10—11：40！！！感觉，还是“太幼稚啦”！！！只能适合和小虎墩年纪相仿的，3—6岁的儿童！！！对于我来说，确实接受不了！！！没什么意思！！！只能是尴尬的笑笑：哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈！！！！！！
值得带孩子去看看
剧情6分，有点老套，人物刻画不鲜明、不真实，但是动画效果和细节9分。带四岁半女儿去看的，她有点害怕
很意外的一部！虎墩真是人小鬼大有主意，为了镖师梦努力拼搏的样子看得我热血沸腾！
最令人发指的是，片尾彩蛋才是正片，信息量全都集中在片尾彩蛋上，正片反而成了片尾彩蛋的加长预告片。
毒液日渐转为小可爱 和eddie小情侣撒泼吃醋顺便打坏人嘤嘤嘤 笑死 woody Harrelson天生杀人狂回归 有几场戏挺暗黑的 娱乐性够了 是近期比较喜欢的marvel了
行了，5～6岁的小朋友看足够了，5岁的儿子看打斗场面还有点害怕呢
小虎墩的形象设计很成功，因为是非神话原创，必须支持
整个电影剧情拖沓 小虎墩像个作精 完全看不出有什么成长的地方 强行煽情 逻辑混乱 套路式剧情 网络用语一堆 国产动画的悲哀
虽然虎墩的形象真的蛮可爱，但是会有想打他的冲动，叛逆期也太早了吧！其次鲁妹就是我的笑点
抓一只动物园里的猩猩来当导演，拍的都不会比这差。
虽然虎墩的形象真的蛮可爱，但是会有想打他的冲动，叛逆期也太早了吧！其次鲁妹就是我的笑点
啊这，也太平平无奇了，唯一的亮点只有彩蛋。而且比起男主，我很神奇地喜欢女主的未婚夫啊，非常明白女主为啥会选他。
还是初四那天带孩子看的呢，小虎墩聪明又勇敢适合带娃去看看，《虎啸春来》好听，推荐。
现在国漫设计非得迎合欧美，搞眯眯眼吗？就这么没有文化自信吗？搞了眯眯眼，海外票房好了吗？
故事情节很中国化，每个角色的形象颇具特色
排片真的少，家附近影院唯一一场是早上八点半的…合格的“陪娃看”电影，故事线清晰流畅，但少了点出彩的地方
故事完成度一般，不过想想是推向小朋友的也就能理解了。
美工不错，画的西域风光蛮漂亮，人物造型和动作设计也还过得去，主题歌好听，但是.但是..但是….编剧水平太低了，情节弱智，逻辑性差，根本就不懂得怎么讲故事，前面像一个性格古板没幽默感的老同志讲大白话，后面变成幼稚园没毕业的儿童编瞎话，糟蹋了动画制作团队的勤奋与努力，就像一盘有机蔬菜被吵制成难以下咽的垃圾食品。给两星只是对美工、动画与配乐的鼓励，不建议观看
豆瓣5.7还挺中肯的 是真的给小朋友看的动画片 现在国漫的画质什么都越来越好了 但情节总是个硬伤。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
