Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
这是所看第一部以新冠为背景的电影。
看到的第一部涉及新冠疫情的影片，在灾难面前人性与价值的呈现。这不是那些习惯了胜利叙事的人所习惯的角度，但却最能触动人心。
另：还有什么是Jodie不能演的吗？？？
我愿意用看dont look up的时间再看一次help
新冠下的护理机构，疫情初期的风口浪尖。为了感情线的发展，结尾稍微有点戏剧化了。
Help，说是援助，更像呼救，以及呼救得不到响应的无助。女主留守护理院的那个长镜头很实用，浅焦和晃动直击了挣扎和崩溃的全过程，明灭不定的感应灯也是妙用，有如一脚踏在人间一脚踩在地狱，也给剪辑点创造了机会。从崩溃到出逃，自然是对体制的不信任，但没费力去交代心理动机，仿佛摆明了左派立场，这些都是我骨子里的，最后对镜直接控诉也是愤怒到了一个顶点的意料中事。
同样是讲述新冠疫情的电影，这和XX医生带给我的震撼和喜好程度完全是天差地别。这部小制作虽然小，但依然保留了最基本的电影感以及优秀的演员表演。朱迪·科默那段救助打电话的长镜头足以刻进我的年度难忘瞬间中。本片用以小见大的方式来剖析当时的英国在面对新冠疫情时的社会生活方方面面。仅仅是通过一辆救护车，几通电话就能营造出当时的混乱和对底层人民的抛弃与谎言，可见这部电影的控诉意味有多强，更不必提最后朱迪坐在车里以打破第四面墙的方式发出的灵魂拷问了。
五星是因为对比太明显。
这样的视角去呈现疫情下人们的生存状态比咱们的“中国医生”更真实，更有力量~我收藏的女神从来都不可能只是个花瓶
好家伙，你瓣共情专供片哈。这片子的剧情走向挺迷惑的。
热评的这些是舔出了优越感了么？片子是好片子，不同视角审视反思社会的不足恨触动人，但吐酸水的真的还是早点移民吧。
3.5+0.5星。角度切入得偏，疫情时代鲜少有人关注护理院的人群，最后一句质问“生命是不平等的吗”，唉，一年过后，有变好吗？
我的小杀手请多拍点这种类型的片子。（话说真是我今年看的第一步和疫情有关剧情片呢
后半部分有点too much 但是我夫演得好
最后片尾的自白更是对所有人的叩问：
Judie的演技👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
女主最后一段在警车里冲着那些警察说的话，是对现今英国政府的痛斥。
4星半 要是不涉及某些政治元素与愤懑 可以打5星了 由小及大 由点及面的佳作
小变态的演技和故事的真实性打4🌟，很多镜头很模糊，不知道是特意为之还是…
以小见大，挺好，四星给真敢拍真的东西，比那些冠冕堂皇歌功颂德假大空的伪纪录片好的太多了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
