A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
没看过老版所以无法对比，对涉及的政治问题也无感，唯一赞叹的是影片的色彩应用和摄影构图，血浆不少但是血腥场面却又处理得很克制。
包括剧情,
比较平淡的爱情向电影，虽然剧情设置上一点也不“平淡”，独立女明星+平民理工男的幻想。结尾有点仓促。
很老土 为了Owen Wilson看的 但是Jennifer Lopez 也是真努力啊
可惜处理的不太好。如果说教味能轻一些，整体处理的更“A24”一些，那这会是另一部《逃出绝命镇》。7分吧，没到四星但也不止三星。
另外算我求求所有导演，不要再在大银幕上拼凑短视频和直播竖屏了可以吗
欧文·威尔逊真的好老且不帅，对土狗片不排斥，但是老实人能不能找个好看的演....
1992年《糖果人》的续集，曾执导《逃出绝命镇》《我们》的乔丹·皮尔担任编剧，乔丹·皮尔作为本片编剧，对影片的风格产生了显而易见的影响，黑人种族议题贯穿全片。
两颗星给JLo和片子里的歌，确实很美&蛮好听。
奔着标准千禧年无脑美式chick flick买了票，一整个性转版《曼哈顿女佣》，满足了我所有观影预期；甜甜腻歪就完事了要什么剧情。欧文金毛大狗勾欸！这谁能够拒绝🥺音乐好加分，就是很传统的好听；出电影院走在路上扭了半天marry me，这波原声什么时候出胶！
题外话：我忽然觉得，近几年美影的政治正确就好像会哭的孩子有奶吃。收到不公对待也可能有两面性，就如同犹太人曾收到过不公对待一样。肯定有什么原因导致了这些不公。当然不否认有个体存在，就如同：“我见过最高尚的兽人,也见过最卑劣的人类”一样。急于定性某件事情，并不是明智的决定。时间会消散很多东西，时间也会证明很多东西。
他两在一起是真没有Cp感，应该找大本来。还有就是Jlo的身材真是几十年如一日的一级棒
影片的第一个场景用剪影的方式，不仅重现了2020年5月25日，美国黑人乔治·弗洛伊德在白人警察暴力执法后死亡的事件，也奠定下了影片的整体基调——黑人种族议题。
感觉这片就是为了被拿去翻拍成泰版，韩版，日版和中国版的，剧本和主演们都时光倒转二十年可能还有点新鲜劲。不过竟然有了负负得正的效果，这种糖水味的甜腻产品背后也是一种真实。
哎，要是能真复兴90年代的rom com就好了
2022/3/29 MSP alone 就是那种绝对跟现实不沾边的片子，可是还是能被这样的虚空动容
好久没看过这么难看的电影了，换个男主可能有三星。
7分，虽然剧情有些过于天真，但凯特和查理彼此了解的过程还是挺有意思，里面的歌也都挺不错。虽然彼此的生活有着天壤之别，但也正是因为这样的差异让凯特能从中体会普通人生活的淳朴，也让查理能从中放开自己的拘束。凯特说的话还是很有道理，如果我们总是回头留念，很容易重蹈覆辙，做出完全不同的决定虽然看似疯狂，但说不定能走出一条更有希望的路。
也许是我站着说话不腰疼，我真的看够黑哥（姐）们说老黑惨痛伤痕的电影了，倦了。此片艺术造诣不赖，摄影美术，氛围营造的很出色，声音设计也有对应特色，音乐更是配合续集基调用上复古音色合成器，整体视听都让我心生欢喜，就是这诉说欲与价值观跟扇巴掌一样狠狠糊在我脸上，我真的被扇累了。希望老黑们放过自己放过大家，痛苦大家都知道了记住了，但暴力对抗暴力真的是你族的出路吗？
特别理所应当的情感走向，毫不意外的起承转合。诺丁山令人信服，这部让人觉得情感就是儿戏。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
