Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
如果抗日神片也能拍成这样，我还是愿意看的。另外，印度人是不是看这种片子太多了，所以觉得可以和中国打的有来有回？？
------
印度终于能拍一部描写搅屎棍英国在印度胡作非为、草菅人命的片子，真难得，就凭揭露搅屎棍的恶行，就应该给5星。
虽是神剧，但可解压。电影用来消遣，导演获得利润，只有英国白人殖民者死伤惨重，完败
一贯的慢镜，浪漫，特写神威，当神话片看就挺好的。
燃爆了好吧！什么叫文化自信！！！什么他妈的叫文化自信！！！
荞麦和杰尼斯表情都好棒🥺看着他们紧张了我也紧张了看着他们一起抽烟我也想在个人分享一根纸烟。大格局上，国家啊民族之类的表现较弱，但是对手戏真的很有张力啊！
黑夜草坪上同吸一支烟、生机勃勃的三个年轻生命，他们曾设想过历史洪流会将他们裹挟至何处吗
印度战狼名不虚传，种种浮夸又极具想象力的动作设计让人叹服。印度演员也真不容易，光编排舞蹈就挺费时间吧，肢体不协调都演不了男主。赤手屠熊搏虎，乔峰来了都不一定打得过这俩兄弟吧😂又尬又乐，看完开心一整天
比起巴霍巴力差的不是一点半点，但总体来说是一部大制作电影，虽然有点浮夸，看多了印度片也觉得没啥了，但这腿瘸成这样，包包草药就行动自如了？这印度药神的还是让我无法说服我自己😂小老虎近期这两部电影，一部RRR，一部对父亲的爱，还是对自己演技和戏路是个很大的突破。总体来说不错的。
看哭了，倒不是拍得多好。只是代入感很强，很心酸。“我本可以一枪毙了希特勒”，但我们终究是普通人。
哈哈哈，除了莫名其妙的歌舞、开挂的抗英神片剧情，长达三小时的电影居然没有让人疲倦，一波波的剧情小高潮，人物的情感也能让人认同
两个女主角仅有的作用就是降低一点故事的腐度……
其实了解一下一战后英国有多么力不从心就不难理解影片中张伯伦为什么说自己只能打好手上有限的牌。你也不能以一个几十年之后的角度去批判当下的决定。谁都能当armchair quarterback但又有什么意思呢。
就着渣画质可下饭的3小时神片，现代印度版武松打虎，RRR！牛牛牛！
观感比巴利霍利差多了，双男主设定，两个胡须佬。开场十分钟无法直视，没想到后面都这样，想来这是印度片的特色。与白人女性那几场戏仿佛京都球侠
拍得很不错啊 摄影 动作 剧情 特效 都是上上乘 我们的抗战片能拍出这个水平 拍多少部我去影院贡献多少部票房 而不是现在CJH那种玩意 甚至比那更烂的比比皆是
终于看上了！没想到这俩男主会有这么好磕…荞麦又在紧急送关键信件哈哈哈哈 德国小哥太帅了！开头剪辑碎得我一度难以入戏 但越看越觉得总体还不错 拍得真的蛮抓人的 但感觉男主和妻子的部分没太大作用？结尾重复开头三个人那段感觉也很unnecessary 张伯伦的那种政客的狡猾嘴脸还是展现得挺好的 有代入感了 虽然查了一下感觉一些历史上的细节没拍出来 可能电影也无意于此吧 又知道了一段二战历史就很nice～
慢镜头把影片的时长至少拉长了一个半小时。
虽然德国小哥更帅，但是我真的太喜欢George Mackay了！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
