Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
对白有点腔调，打戏也不错。美女配来男人有点不适啊
坦白说，这个故事的逻辑有很大的问题，直到故事结局，我也不知道穆迪装死回来之后用炸药和人家同归于尽是为什么，我甚至不知道为什么他们几个人调查海斯就会被杀，也不知道Anna一家干什么了就要被屠杀
流水线作品 演员和导演都受制于剧本和人物本身的问题 几场比较干净的动作戏勉强可看
其实还可以看看，如果你把这当作《杀手妻子的保镖》番外或平行宇宙，以及尼基塔大战老蝙蝠侠的话。。。
出于私心来说，这真的是我心中的圆梦电影，Q是我初中看的第一部英美剧的女主，当时超喜欢的，迈克尔基顿还是我心中《七君子》里面的将军（好帅），他俩搭一起，出于私心，我狠狠的喜欢了。虽然但是，这俩人是怎么能发展到“Kill me or fuck me”这样的段落的…
咱打不动就别打了，这老胳膊老腿的，踹个人，还带反弹儿的。。。紧身衣没毛病，但穿着起球了的秋衣秋裤当suit up， 是不是就有点欺负人了。。。。。。。。。
冲着MaggieQ打三星 打戏还是挺好看的 但越到后面越莫名其妙 太扯了 感觉可以拍的更好
故事围绕伦勃朗和安娜展开，这两个世界上最顶级的杀手将揭露一段发生在越南的神秘往事。多年来，他们游遍全球来互相争夺最抢手的合同。但当安娜的导师穆迪被谋杀时，她和伦勃朗必须结盟，返回越南追捕凶手。
Maggie Q身材还是爆好，但已经不是当年的Nikita，剧情就很 一 般
09.01.21 Nikita is baaaack yo! Good popcorn.
别被评分骗了，是部好看的动作惊悚片，这个完成度很不错了，现在很少这类型的片了，起码比那个啥火药奶昔好两分。
出于私心来说，这真的是我心中的圆梦电影，Q是我初中看的第一部英美剧的女主，当时超喜欢的，迈克尔基顿还是我心中《七君子》里面的将军（好帅），他俩搭一起，出于私心，我狠狠的喜欢了。虽然但是，这俩人是怎么能发展到“Kill me or fuck me”这样的段落的…
动作戏可以的，比较硬，感情戏莫名其妙，最后萨缪尔炸死大反派之后那段基顿去送死更是毫无理由。MaggieQ始终欣赏不来，不过本片里还拍的挺过得去。
只能说好莱坞对Maggie Q演过的赤裸特工印象很深刻
别被评分骗了，是部好看的动作惊悚片，这个完成度很不错了，现在很少这类型的片了，起码比那个啥火药奶昔好两分。
Maggie Q真的好看 除此之外一言难尽
只记得MQ身材真不错，妈惹法克侠这次不怎么骂人节奏不对……
老套过时的杀手片。动作戏中规中矩，文戏无病呻吟。缘由交代不清，动机不明，没有代入感。唯一产生点化学反应的两个杀手之间的惺惺相惜，被一句kill me or fuck me彻底毁掉。这么多年了，Maggie Q的面瘫技更上一层楼——更面瘫了……
一群老头演了一坨粑粑。
近年来流行的大女主动作片，最大的看点是Maggie Q保持了一如既往的飒爽身手，有点尼基塔大电影版的感觉......剩下的内容就乏善可陈了，当娱乐片凑合能看完...
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
