Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
果然是个，，，，，片子
放到电影院上映铁定有人会提前离席打程度。电脑看都会产生生理痛感，更不要说大银幕，但是刀子割下去的瞬间又无比的爽。相比于前作，柯南伯格的这部作品野心更大。最可怕的不是这些恐怖的镜头，最可怕的应该是这在未来将会成真。（小k怎么不论演什么都是她自己啊？也太出戏了）
Surgery is the new sex. 音乐优秀，信念十足。唯一不足的，可能是解释太多，展现太少。
最后吐槽一下蕾老师后期的月牙头造型，灵感来源是女明星打了除皱针还没消肿的样子吗？
比钛好懂，比欲望号快车类型元素少，但是也没看特别懂
低于预期，看完感觉故事上弱了点，跟Titane比少的就是一个吸引人的主线剧情，支线剧情和有些配角的动机没有写好，比如面瘫。不过对艺术、身体进化等等的讨论、讽刺和思辨还是很inspiring，塞杜的那段独白还不错。看完Spencer觉得面瘫会演戏了，但是看完这部又觉得面瘫还确实不会演戏。
跟戛纳邪典佳作《钛》比起来简直就是东施效颦后的尴尬作品，看得人昏昏欲睡，口味不够重，剧情还稀碎，可惜了维果的演技（不是）和蕾雅的肉体，小K更是大概率连自己都不知道在演个什么东西，白白浪费了两个小时。。。
What if we are able to design human bodies?柯南伯格思辨着一个human augmentation走向极点的未来，以情感、艺术、商业、政治的新范式点缀这个新世界。看到创作者的意志驱动身体内源的创造力进化出新的器官（自然物-->人造物），还是有眼前一亮。大多数器官改造的思辨设计停留在去人类中心的反思，此片却用艺术和宗教（人类主体性）扩展了一个更具争议的对话空间。在痛感和快感的刀锋之外，字里行间的小幽默和结尾老式性爱的拥吻得以看见导演的俏皮和幽默。
人类的创造需要由人类的进化所构成平衡的新世界。不过话说回来，小男孩解剖戏份里大家的反应和身体内部让我很困惑，以及lifeware谋杀塑料人的动机也让我很困惑。如果就以艺术映射来解释肉体与灵魂的权利交换也不是不可以，但我们这些药理人第一反应就是，你们所说的干细胞培植与痛觉清理但又不完全清理，我觉得不是一个可以一劳永逸的小手术… 这种极度物质贫乏的世界里，大家一起做新世界的塑料人，是不是也是一种浪漫呢。
这样的艺术何尝不是另外一种会被批判的艺术，也许这种艺术对现在的人类来说还为时尚早吧。这样的片子看一遍都是痛苦和煎熬，完全没兴趣去细细品味。
的，因此这种学说必然会把社会分成两部分。
陆陆续续看完了，我这低俗的品味，电影本身应该有些东西，但除了概念化真看不出别的了。
7星，去掉性感的概念底子里是现实主义，手法大于内容。实践理论而非解构和讨论。不过柯南伯格能让小K把长久以来的表演缺陷发挥到极致形成一种人物风格，挺厉害的哈哈哈哈。
关于性的快感与痛感的另一种解释，利用痛感的刺激来达到颅内高潮的行为艺术确实猎奇，但却缺乏灵与肉的碰撞之美，没有很惊世骇俗。相对来说，我会更喜欢《钛》的病态美。
如果说几十年前柯南伯格拍的那些主打感官的恐怖片仍是类型化的，那么《未来罪行》相比之下则更加恢宏、深刻、哲学和冰冷。在极简的场景和人物关系中更侧重于呈现对进化的那种近乎病态的迷恋，拥抱混乱和无序，沉迷未知和危险。相比之下情节的弱化和结尾的仓促都不重要了，它更像是一个未来编年史的开头一页，永恒熵增的一幕序章。
形式大于概念，到后来甚至觉得有些好笑，觉得符合人类装模作样又故作高深的浅薄。另外k在此片的感觉像是从暮色穿越过来的…
看不懂的、名导导的、名演员演的，一律算好片。
片中的几个装置可以找一个当代艺术中心直接搬进去了。总感觉今天会在梦里再见到Léa和Viggo躺在the Sark里，招我进入身体之中……
打开肉体的同时，思想也在被解放。疼痛，性欲，艺术，政治，最终升华到人类身体与意识的二元进化。作为科幻片，这个创意赞了，100分钟的故事还很初级，似乎只做了个设定，便戛然而止，但太多线索还亟待展开，柯南伯格要拍个限定剧，我肯定还是会追
有点空 概念也有点炒冷饭 但是还是很对味的身体恐惧！后人类依旧在玩重复的身体表演艺术 但Still shout out for Cronenberg!
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
