Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
最后出门你们两个没戴口罩吧。
拉高一下評分! zoe反殺那段看得太爽了! 結尾elastica好評👏🏾
5/10，没啥意思的电影，冲着导演去的但是风格没有完全释放，也没有深刻探讨人工智能啊，通信隐私这类的话题，结尾超蠢
女主反杀的也太随意了，这年头杀手不好当啊...
what is this fucking trash
小成本，想法挺好，拍得太儿戏了，这有哪门子的惊悚。 最后一手钉枪一手玫瑰挺有意思，这么好的公寓我也想住。
前半部分太冗长了，没必要，最后反杀几个坏蛋的时候还挺爽的，那个胖子邻居全部的作用居然就是帮助女主拖住坏蛋，一开始还以为也是坏蛋呢，anyway，万物互联还可以这样玩，有点意思，不得不说，美帝就是怪咖多
智能家居带来的隐私泄露和后台程序漏洞带来的犯罪隐患 题材选得挺好 故事讲得一般
继《零和一》之后又一部后疫情电影，索德伯格成为疫情后遗症/社交媒体监控/性别议题的真正阐释者
美国程序员都能住得起这么大的房子的吗？都可以在自己家里跑酷了……还是说西雅图房价很低？
后窗，姐妹情仇，窃听大阴谋，等到天黑。”……其实拍的并不好
要不是冲着女主，也不会看的。片子🌟🌟女主➕🌟
+。索德伯格稳定输出，这种情节极简的类型片看着太舒服。不光一下就甩掉了疫情、人工智能、科技与隐私这些老生常谈，就连似乎埋下伏笔的身世之谜也撇开不论，直接让结尾的钉枪反杀救赎一切。
such a mediocre film, what should I suppose to say, should I praise the feminism, or congratulate to the depression, social phobia patients, it's just a normal criminal film, don't tell me some classic scenes which didn't help anything
三星半，开场以为是个安东尼奥尼“放大”式的悬疑加哲学片，看到三分之一时才发现不是这么回事。不过没关系，镜头调度把主要人物的怪异感表现得淋漓尽致，后窗的致敬也不落窠臼，同是无法避免被窥视的命运，有些窥视成了遇害后留下的线索，有些窥视与追踪成了追杀的工具，而另一些反而变成救命的机会。女主脆弱的心理状态，又何尝不是想通过救她人，来拯救受伤的自我呢。最后，数据标注员在纽约住那样的大房子，这个设定实在是太随便了。
科技，疫情等结合的还蛮好，虽然剧情也是老套剧情，周末无聊看还是很爽的.
索德伯格这拍片速度，这质量。让我很难不喜欢
社恐技术女发现高层秘密欲被封口，结果反杀对方三人，最后10分钟才酷起来
7 前两天在看完听风者之后想到，这类声音为主内容的电影缺乏表现性，没想到索子已经借由科技开始进行探索。从一开始的声音先入，到房间内寻找声音的过程，再到出门后无时无刻存在的背景音皆是在做此实验。重构的后窗是致敬也是手段，完成了听到看的合谋。但结尾处看的宅男冒着生命危险帮助女主也没能抱得美人归，表明了索子对于类型发展的态度。电脑戏做成桌面形式，出门后用kimi一直引导看就更好了
85% 1.蓝色、黄色的使用逻辑 （室内和室外反差）2. 追踪人物足迹时、幽灵视点的摄影机拟人化了又一重窥伺的目光，俯仰、倾斜的镜头拉满了压迫感的情绪，给予了电影紧促的呼吸节奏 3.明快的剪辑 4.剧本最大可能做减法与一般类型片背道而驰反而增添了一份优雅的气质 5.女性主义的高光时刻
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
