Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
影帝还是要夸一夸的。师徒情重点，淡化了个人的成长，不能说叫自传，怀念老师吧。突然想到座头市结尾那一段，还有很多北野武电影里的跳舞场景，人啊，都会不自觉怀念最思念的那个人啊。虽然最后的强煽看起来有点没必要。
是一部很“爽”的战争片。但受篇幅所限，人物单薄，没有立起来。
老谋子就是能把一个挺普通的故事，拍到让你不快进
为什么美国狙击手一开枪就跳出掩体暴露自己？
小场面描绘了抗美援朝战争的一部分，不影响惊心动魄，生死一线，战友情谊的表达。敌人也不容低估
除了最后一段有点尬，国师还是国师，爱哭包的性格设定太讨喜了
恩师的意外，搭档的自戕，母子的关系…
老谋子还是老谋子。主旋律狠狠拿捏了。近几年抗美援朝主题最佳
真实的历史中，有多少付出这么大牺牲后依然没换回情报的时候…
聚焦小人物，体现大事件。全场眼眶湿了好几次，更是第一次感受到志愿军战歌的力量与气势。
但从好莱坞开始，大家都特别喜欢看狙击手对狙，但其实这个在战场上很难发生。这也很能表现戏剧冲突，个人英雄主义也好，但真的就好看，想看。
老谋子电影独有韵味 谁也替代不了
最后讲笑话都讲出泪点了，还是厉害。师徒情也是相当感人了。影帝很努力，但他还是他自己。基础很好，但过程还是有些处理太戏剧化了，有点为煽情而煽情了。
从师傅的身上，我看到一个演员固执的坚守，即使台下无人喝彩，他依旧为自己的演出感到光荣。在舞女的歌中，我听见一位歌手无奈的际遇，纵然观众高朋满座，她还是将自己的愿望压在心底。命运几番嘲弄，人生几度秋凉，即使路途遥远，我也不会投降，因为我已经做好了准备，用一颗赤子之心拥抱滚烫的理想。这不是北野武传记最佳的表达方式，但却饱含着北野武心中最尊重的某些东西，譬如深见千三郎所坚持的文艺老炮的高傲与体面：我的喜剧，可以让人会心一笑，但绝不可以当做玩笑，再不堪也要帅气的活着。观看过程中不断想起马东在《十三邀》里提到的那句：悲凉的底色，将苦难编成段子笑着说出来，这是喜剧演员独有的向生活宣战的特权，只有这样，悲凉才有可能变成底色，而不是主色。北野武看过的话大概会含泪骂道：那个像猴子一样家伙竟然是我啊，八嘎呀路！
超出预期 没有明星阵容 没有大量宣发 没有足够排片 差点被错过的一部好片
浅草师徒两人的情谊真的太动人了，大年初一把我看哭。张弛有度，泪中带笑，两个人都演得特别好。表面上一副别惹老子样子，内心都憋着一股劲，默默地付出。从电视上大骂东京奥运会开幕就可以看出，北野武本身也像是这样活着，师傅说艺人不是要去讨好观众，而是要告诉观众什么是好笑。台上可以装疯卖傻，但是下台了一定要体面……都是很朴实又深刻的人生感悟。
原来性格跟老师有很大关系啊 对表演的热爱成就今天的北野武 最近看柳乐优弥上头 演技着实让人着迷
2.8看完 冲着老谋子去的 三星吧 一个简单的小故事讲了一个半小时 中国狙击手个个爆头 外国狙击手个个对军事法庭很恐惧
化繁从简，挺好。只是孩子的设定有点脱离现实，有点假。还特意通过画外音解释了一下。
不值四星，每个人物都刻画的很不错，片长也很适中，整体故事完整，凡事都怕个但是……但是美军两个头目不合差点狙杀指挥官，和最终志愿军连长来接人的场景对比太鲜明了，这个有必要么？坦克内两个美军的对话是什么鬼，这个部分的剧情设定太尴尬了，最终的政治正确丝毫没有意义，完全不如前半场的双方对战，各种人物情绪的表达显得丰满和真实，总的来说，三星可看
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
