You are never fully liberated from Auschwitz, 11 July 2016 Author: Red-125 from Upstate New York The French movie "À la vie" was shown in the U.S. with the translated title "To Life (2014)." It was written and directed by Jean-Jacques Zilbermann. The film is a Post-Holocaust saga, although it opens with scenes in Auschwitz that are truly horrific. Hélène (Julie Depardieu) and Lily (Johanna ter Steege) were friends in Auschwitz, and they managed to survive the death march from Auschwitz to Louslau together. A third friend, Rose (Suzanne Clément) was unable to walk, so they were forced to leave her behind. As it turned out, Rose survived until the liberation of Auschwitz. The three did not see each other again until 1962, when they come together for a reunion at a beachside resort in Northern France. We learn early in the movie that Lily divorced her husband after the war, and is living as a "free soul," with no permanent partner. Hélène and Rose both married concentration camp survivors. The plot of the film--based on the lives of three actual friends--revolves around their interactions during the reunion. No matter how much ice cream they eat, and how they display their new bathing suits, thoughts keep circling back to Auschwitz. They quarrel about tiny details which they remember differently. They revive horrible memories. It's clear that the reunion will change their lives, but whether the change will be for the better or for the worse is an open question. For reasons I don't understand, "To Life" caries a terrible IMDb rating of 6.1. Fortunately, we saw it as part of the excellent Rochester Jewish Film Festival. If we hadn't had "All-Event" tickets, we probably would have stayed home. This is a movie to be seen, not missed. Ignore the rating and seek it out. It's available on DVD, and it will work well on the small screen. See it!
# 72 Berlinale 主竞赛# 这是婚礼前的筹备吗
从头开始就是一路胜利
有这么个自大偏执控制狂的父亲真是惨，最后成功只是恰好女儿真的有天赋罢了。
当然经历过实在的历史记录，还是说，影像不过是为自身的成功学证明合法性，这背后又是彼岸社会问题、泛滥思潮的何等体现呢？！
黑权、女权是政治上的光环，然而对于父权的崇拜才是内核，可以说这个题材有很多种拍法，我没想到是这样的呈现，最突兀最割裂就是结尾的冗长的比赛，这样一部电影，真正运动本片不重要，对于我这样对网球本来就不熟悉的人，真的是食之无味，弃之也不可惜。威尔史密斯的表演也挺尴尬的，结尾真人少数的几个镜头，就让我对这个原型人物感兴趣，本质上还是一部父权赞歌，可能在国内还能讨论下，但是还是落后于时代。
9个月后，维纳斯与瑞跑签下1200万美元合约，她当时年仅15岁。身为她俩教练理查德仍坚持相较于年少成名，耐性，家庭和教育更重要他在贫民窟时为女儿制订的计划几乎全数成真。
电影永远达不到纪录片的程度，这种片子看完了解一下故事背景就得了，同样的叙述方式，同样的故事结构的电影实在太多了。奥斯卡越来越走下坡路了。
生活在黑人社区，由父母带出的世界网坛第一，前半段比较沉闷，预期就是偏鸡汤激励式的剧情，主线主要说大威，但我跟喜欢小威。
我就说这两个女儿的经历那么像大威小威，原来真的是她们的传记片，但是影片从父亲的角度出发去讲述，这是个比较独具新颖的角度可以产生不一样的看法。
我现在看到威尔史密斯演这种励志政治正确样板戏就有点疲劳，但不得不说这个剧本非常精确精准，没有半点拖泥带水，剧情起伏也非常好莱坞，是一部准确的教科书模板，可以是晚饭后去看一眼然后回家睡觉的片子，中规中矩，在规范的百分卷上答了99到100分。只有一点，不要再说教了这位大男子主义的父亲。
目前7.3太低了，拍得挺走心，有趣，享受就对了
难以评价的父亲，毕竟天赋才是更多的决定了一个运动员的上限，如果不是两个女儿恰好有这样的天赋，她们的生活又该有多凄惨？更不用说私生活一塌糊涂，让人敬佩，又难以喜欢
这么平的剧情，这么浅薄的人物塑造，我觉得这一届的奥斯卡男主大概率是九字了。
非常坚定乐观的父亲，但感觉女儿的戏份有些少了
威尔史密斯在本片中用眼神、表情、肢体都展现出来了，影帝当之无愧。
节奏把控好，片名真的很妙。但我还是会很警惕这种家长。沟通台词可解析
屠狗太过分了必须扣一星以表愤怒，微笑着听对方讲话并附议“好有趣哦”当然对谁都奏效，洪尚秀真是大俗人。不过结尾金敏喜那个微妙的神情，也是对秀恩爱的一种讥讽？夸有灵感的人、貌美的人、有才华和天赋的人，平庸之辈不值一提，他们的嫉妒也要直接忽视——好残忍的一个视角啊。
敏喜和导演互道i love you 的时候我要甜晕了，我不管就是十级主观的给打满星
不能因为他的成功而肯定他的做法，整部电影的价值观都很有问题。
在美国这样一个国家，教育是严重撕裂的，如果你的收入属于底层，那你周围的一切都很难有所改观。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
