剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 洋念双 3小时前 :

    分镜不是特别稳,但总体还是很感动的,电影院里不少人都是哭爆,所以下面会是1.5吗。

  • 芸菲 8小时前 :

    本片借助于一个患有解离型双重人格障碍的女主播,来探讨令人压抑和窒息的东方式母女关系议题,具有一定的社会现实意义。女主播对于自我社会身份认知的执拗、偏差、挣扎、误读与迷失,和娜塔莉·波特曼的那部《黑天鹅》所提示的主题有异曲同工之妙。不过,本片更注重故事的悬疑色彩,片尾的反转存在炫技的刻意,有讨好观众的嫌疑,但从商业性方面来说无疑是成功的!

  • 艾心语 2小时前 :

    基本上看到开头就能感受到案件里的母女关系和主播本身受到控制的母女关系之间的互文,再加上《黑天鹅》式的职场内卷心魔,类似的电影已经有很多,连悬念的制造都显得模板化。虽然为千禹熙和李慧英都提供了大展类型片演技的机会,但类型片终究是类型片,机能上要求再高,精神分裂写得天花乱坠,也不是真正在写精神世界上富足的人。

  • 采帛 8小时前 :

    7.6 氣氛渲染的很不錯,也喜歡主線劇情的進行,不會完全猜不到也不會全都被摸透,是可以邊看邊抽絲剝繭的電影,但節奏比較慢。

  • 衣若翠 9小时前 :

    解说//女性气质浓厚的电影,果然是女导演,聚焦母女感情和生育焦虑,女主丈夫在本片里几乎就是一个打酱油的角色,好评!电视台女主播面对新人竞争和年龄压力,某天接到的神秘电话让她出现了演出事故,为了补救前去调查,结果发现母弑女案,其中心理医生的嫌疑很大。结局严母已上吊自杀,女主人格分裂

  • 蕾曼 1小时前 :

    其实我已经对女人自身的伤痛感觉到了厌烦,一切都在情理之中意料之内,故事发展也很工业流水线,基本都是印证着套路,可圈可点的大约是演员的表演

  • 栋文 5小时前 :

    看看人家这公司为了卖卡而做的努力,再看看我们那些狗策划为了撕卡而做的付出……

  • 歧绣文 0小时前 :

    在我心中评分比豆瓣高,可能是因为对这种原生家庭的伤害深有体会。 母亲以为已被忘记的6岁那年扼着她脖子的双手,其实扼杀着她的一生。 自己活成了最不想成为的人,竭尽全力希望摆脱的母亲,便是她自己。

  • 答杏儿 0小时前 :

    同时本片还展示了母女间的控制、共生。

  • 相绮烟 2小时前 :

    这个每天不同的饭团也是厉害啊→_→

  • 馨凡 6小时前 :

    《我吃了那个男孩一整年的早餐》作为青春片完全是大大的及格好吧,没有流产堕胎数不清的三角恋,感情没有拖拖拉拉,人设也非常立体讨喜,如果导演可以做的再细一些,完全可以和《初恋那点小事》媲美了

  • 莱俊捷 4小时前 :

    一开始我以为走向是《恐怖直播》,结果,嗯…

  • 颜冷之 5小时前 :

    《我吃了那个男孩一整年的早餐》作为青春片完全是大大的及格好吧,没有流产堕胎数不清的三角恋,感情没有拖拖拉拉,人设也非常立体讨喜,如果导演可以做的再细一些,完全可以和《初恋那点小事》媲美了

  • 舒幻桃 4小时前 :

    5/10。中间有很多不合常理令人翻白眼的尴尬桥段,这些做作青春片真的要在大荧幕看才能投入。

  • 濮夏彤 6小时前 :

    更多属于心理惊悚,其实一开始暗示挺多的,之后的走向倒也在情理之中。

  • 魏仲舒 1小时前 :

    就那样,看着想睡觉。没感觉多出彩,多重人格的主播罢了。故弄玄虚

  • 阚千风 6小时前 :

    被主演们的精湛演技折服,电影也没那么无聊了

  • 琛琳 4小时前 :

    很不错啊,这是个新人女导演。以前是小演员,这次自编自导,完成度很高,有点九十年代港片那种感觉,落脚点母女关系的故事,起承转合结尾反转,都不缺,也不生硬,虽然我猜到结尾是啥,但是悬疑感,节奏感都不错,水准之上的片子,小毛病就不说了,7.3,我愿意打个四星

  • 素涵亮 5小时前 :

    是黄瓜饭团一样清爽又充满元气的初恋故事。台湾青春片真的心太软,男女主角动辄十五二十年以后还在过和爱情有关的人生。因为与现实相悖,所以可以放心的替他们开心。俗套的情节里藏有微小却真诚的部分,是故事动人的真正原因。而且虽然我不buy校花和坏小子的故事,但何思静好可爱哦。李沐更可爱,台湾最近年轻的女演员都超可爱。

  • 端木问芙 5小时前 :

    本片借助于一个患有解离型双重人格障碍的女主播,来探讨令人压抑和窒息的东方式母女关系议题,具有一定的社会现实意义。女主播对于自我社会身份认知的执拗、偏差、挣扎、误读与迷失,和娜塔莉·波特曼的那部《黑天鹅》所提示的主题有异曲同工之妙。不过,本片更注重故事的悬疑色彩,片尾的反转存在炫技的刻意,有讨好观众的嫌疑,但从商业性方面来说无疑是成功的!

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved