Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
舒适小品，多一星给我的英雄，东木jo太郎。
舒适小品，多一星给我的英雄，东木jo太郎。
感觉这两年老爷子拍的电影全是他自己想体验或向往的生活 但这部片子老爷子的幻想太无趣了
廉颇老矣 英雄迟暮
还以为东木这次仍然会为侠气牺牲 没想到只是温馨的小品
电影本身很淡很简单。能够看到老爷子还在拍电影就好温暖，
东木大爷的电影已经不能用正常电影的评判标准去看了
童话版自传体电影
东木老爷爷精神可嘉，不过衷心希望这部不会是您的息影之作啊。
一老一少，一段road trip，路上遇见的人都帮他们，女人爱主角，问题都能迎刃而解。不行，即便这是东木的，也不行。
我还是希望所有垃圾翻译都吃一辈子屎。 温馨公路片。不是什么惊悚西部。豆瓣简介也是吃屎人写出来的。 真是厌恶一切玩忽职守不负责任的人。
看着91的老爷子，看到了温和，看到了一份执着，不打五星心里过不去！
Chicken is macho(strong)
中规中矩平平淡淡的一部公路西部片 即使一切要素都要引导我给三分的时候 我还是给了四分 Eastwood老爷子加一分
1930年05月31日出生的 老东木.........永远的牛仔
对老林的从未如此的失望。一个老得手抖的糟老头，凭啥让上到60下到6岁的女人对一见他就眼冒桃花？！说好的小混混呢？简直是个孝顺友善好少年好不！墨西哥富婆的保镖甲被走路都打晃的老头一拳干倒，保镖乙手持大口径被一只公鸡干倒。没有任何逻辑。甚至刻意的一点小诙谐都那么无聊。强忍快进看完的我，人如片名，我想哭泣。这个片名的翻译也是摸不着头脑，无语。老林确实该回家看孙子了。一星给西部，一星给90岁的老林，不能再多了。
90岁的主演，伊斯特伍德破纪录了吗？虽然电影拖沓，银发驯马师、押镖客算是开拓老年生活新方式。
90岁的Clint Eastwood，老当益壮。
这是一个真善美的儿童片吧？片头的pure American country music 倒是不错啊。
虽然还希望能有更多作品看 但真的感觉到他的力不从心了 好好休息吧 我爱你
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
