Middle class student Bob Letellier enters a new world when he meets Alain, a free-thinking rebel who, along with his group of young Parisians, has opted for a life of instant gratification instead of work and commitment. At a party, Bob meets a young woman, Mic, who appears to be just as carefree and cynical as Alain. Mic's only dream is to own a luxury car, and with Bob's help, she manages to find the money to but it. Mic's friend Clo discovers she is pregnant and, not knowing who the father is, she asks Bob to marry her. When they next meet at a party, Bob and Mic deny that they have any feelings for one another - a declaration that soon leads to tragedy...
Marcel Carné is widely regarded as one of the standard bearers of French quality cinema of the 1930s and 1940s, responsible for such masterpieces as Quai des brumes (1938) and Les Enfants du Paradis (1945). How ironic then that, in 1958, towards the end of his film-making career, he should make a film which dared to portray the attitudes and behaviour of the 1950s youth, in a way that effectively captures the mood and sentiment of the time.
Les Tricheurs was a hugely controversial film, not least because of its blatant depiction of adolescent free-love, and was even banned in some regions of France. It also received some intensely unfavourable reviews, most notably from the young hotheads on the Cahiers du cinéma such as François Truffaut who cited this film as a prime example of the decline of French cinema into mediocrity. In spite of all this negative press, the film proved to be an astonishing commercial success, attracting five million cinema-goers, and was awarded the Grand Prix du Cinéma français in 1958.
Whilst Les Tricheurs is not as flawless as Carné's earlier masterpieces, it is nonetheless a significant work, having the power to both shock and move its audience, whilst having great entertainment value. It evokes the mood of its time in a way that few French films of this period did, depicting young people as pleasure-seeking rebels, rejecting the austerity and discipline of the previous generation whilst pursuing a life without cares, responsibilities or love. Similarities with James Dean's films of the 1950s (most notably Rebel without a Cause) are apparent, although Carné's treatment of young people is far more abstract - in his film they merely symbolise a world that has lost its way, more or less victims of post-war prosperity. Although the young people in Les Tricheurs lack the authenticity to be totally credible, the film does make an important, and indeed quite disturbing point, about where the permissive society may be heading.
Much of the pleasure of the film is in the performances from its four lead actors, Jacques Charrier, Pascale Petit, Laurent Terzieff and Andréa Parisy, although only Terzieff is really convincing in his role. Marcel Carné originally considered Alain Delon and Jean-Paul Belmondo for the parts of Bob and Alain respectively, before opting for Charrier and Terzieff. As a consolation, Carné offered Belmondo a smaller part in the film - alas too small for the actor to be noticed by the public. Belmondo's breakthrough had to wait until the following year when he starred in Jean-Luc Godard's revolutionary A bout de souffle, a film which offers a very different perspective of the youth generation.
换做你是尼奥，你敢赌Trinity 的自由意志吗？
中年危机英雄迟暮的neo，很多熟面孔，增加了演员种族多样性，说话太多以至于没有以前那么酷了
你能想象有一天黑客帝国的水准还不如小贱贱的失控玩家吗？不能吧 so yeah, the world is fucked up already.
遂干脆直接放(破)弃(罐)治(破)疗(摔)，也摒弃了故作高深的架子。在一些新旧呼应时刻有意时不时采用稍显“粗糙狼狈”的自嘲来取代三部曲里的“精致酷炫”（一例：尼奥挡子弹的pose）。
重启续作显然资方的意思，沃卓斯基入局也是无奈，反正与其看别人祸祸自己作品，不如就拿你钱放飞自我一下，借机还可以和老友们聚聚，大家一起过个肥年。我想对于影迷们来说，这部重启作最大的价值，就是提供了一个重温正统三部曲的理由。
时隔那么久出来的续集，看得出来沃卓斯基对片方和创作还是有很多戏谑的不满情绪在（尤其是最后的片尾彩蛋），剧情本身可能唯一的不足就是缺少升级吧
我是有多想不开在跨年夜花160一张的票钱去看这么个烂片……本作根本是挂羊皮卖狗肉，和预告片可以说毫无关系，唯一的看点在于沃卓斯基姐弟（妹？）的官方吐槽：“我们的老板华纳非要我们拍续集，我们就拍了”（摊手）。
打斗完全没有新意，只是在不断重复自己，曾经是超前的思想实验和特效的标杆代表，如今就是狗尾续貂，旧瓶装新酒，又把第一部的模式照搬了一遍，彻底落入了俗套，也许这种系列电影总要被毁掉，而且只能由导演自己亲手毁掉。自嘲还是很不错的，但如今的好莱坞缺乏过硬的原创剧本是硬伤。说实话论有趣程度还不如《Freeguy》。
哦，他们可以。
还好留存了一份自嘲与解构，这一部分值两颗星，其余皆为灾难。拉娜到底为什么拍这部片子，背后又发生了什么呢？解释不清，唯有彩蛋里的那句话可以做脚注了——电影已死，电影已死，重复两遍。
6/10，看完并没有那么差，不过你要挑优点也挑不出来，很多沃斯基导演的黑客帝国老粉丝通过第四部电影台词里面调侃华纳的话给沃斯基甩锅，在我看来剧本烂的锅甩不到华纳头上。
关于华纳兄弟的吐槽大概就是这出电影的全部内容。
差强人意吧，努力搞出了一些悲喜难明的名场面
看了三分之一，弃了……这不就是把老版硬生生重来了一遍吗 -_-
可能是我这几年最喜欢的电影。倒不是拍的有多好，只是特别适合。
quote“整部电影就和基努里维斯的状态一样疲惫” 自我吐槽还挺有意思 不过看下来就感觉像个粉丝玩梗大电影 我全程WTF?? 2022/1/16@星轶with C
里面有大量的致敬前作的剧情画面，如果没看过前作直接看这一部那肯定看不明白，不过像我这种老粉大呼爷青回。剧情其实构建了3个世界，现实世界，虚拟世界，虚拟世界里让尼奥沉迷其中的游戏设计师世界，相应的“控制者”势力也有3个，机械乌贼，Analyst，裘德。令我感到意外的是史密斯为了反抗控制竟然会联合尼奥一起对抗控制者，大概是史密斯也不愿再甘心只当一段代码了吧。
John Wick惊醒 发现一切都是自己在养伤时看黑客帝国三部曲后做的一场梦 活着就像不停刮彩票 永远都不知道会刮出些什么来
可以看，动作戏比较拉，但又没办法不有，美术设计像是复原了80年代的街头审美，又土又旧，布光生硬，整体缺乏电影感。但是内核依然很科幻，机械进化出了亲人派、程序进化出了现实世界的存在、史密斯解决了“我是谁我要干嘛”的问题，已经有了相当的独立意志，另一个救世主的出现也是突破，这跟女性不女性没多大关系，就是说the one不是only one，大家都在进化中，这几个机体已经复杂到超乎想象不为任何个体所控制。IO迎来和平，于是出现了政治问题，leader过过苦日子，宁愿受点委屈维持平衡，但年轻一代不安现状，有人逃避现实的苦难进入程序，有人要争取更多的权益。这些关系和思考都是有趣的，只是表现得非常不好，好在影片从头到尾在自嘲。有了好的基础但在不适合的时间匆忙上马的项目，非常可惜。如果需要人类发电，最经济
全片唯一的亮点来自第121分钟，尼奥一个标志性的帅动作没飞起来。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
