You are never fully liberated from Auschwitz, 11 July 2016 Author: Red-125 from Upstate New York The French movie "À la vie" was shown in the U.S. with the translated title "To Life (2014)." It was written and directed by Jean-Jacques Zilbermann. The film is a Post-Holocaust saga, although it opens with scenes in Auschwitz that are truly horrific. Hélène (Julie Depardieu) and Lily (Johanna ter Steege) were friends in Auschwitz, and they managed to survive the death march from Auschwitz to Louslau together. A third friend, Rose (Suzanne Clément) was unable to walk, so they were forced to leave her behind. As it turned out, Rose survived until the liberation of Auschwitz. The three did not see each other again until 1962, when they come together for a reunion at a beachside resort in Northern France. We learn early in the movie that Lily divorced her husband after the war, and is living as a "free soul," with no permanent partner. Hélène and Rose both married concentration camp survivors. The plot of the film--based on the lives of three actual friends--revolves around their interactions during the reunion. No matter how much ice cream they eat, and how they display their new bathing suits, thoughts keep circling back to Auschwitz. They quarrel about tiny details which they remember differently. They revive horrible memories. It's clear that the reunion will change their lives, but whether the change will be for the better or for the worse is an open question. For reasons I don't understand, "To Life" caries a terrible IMDb rating of 6.1. Fortunately, we saw it as part of the excellent Rochester Jewish Film Festival. If we hadn't had "All-Event" tickets, we probably would have stayed home. This is a movie to be seen, not missed. Ignore the rating and seek it out. It's available on DVD, and it will work well on the small screen. See it!
结尾张力太强了...viggo他好适合...
非常无聊。故事情节很分散割裂。整个片子像80年代的科幻片。里面的器具都很粗糙。不知道小K在里面是什么作用？一个完全没有意义的角色。因为咖位大点就在海报上占一个位置？感觉海报比电影成功。如我所想，大众觉得难看的，豆瓣上的人就会给高分。
抱歉但我真的很喜欢。抛开电影本身的意义，Lea浑身上下每个地方都可以堪称艺术我真的好爱🥰
文本陈旧，概念陈旧，美术缩水，知觉层面啥都没。实在太不行……电影手册的编辑也老了吧。可能唯一辩护的点：他可能就是在做一部怀念式的电影。
形式大于概念，到后来甚至觉得有些好笑，觉得符合人类装模作样又故作高深的浅薄。另外k在此片的感觉像是从暮色穿越过来的…
为。。的实践。仅仅从这一点上来看，我们确
Inner beauty is no longer 内在美 but 内脏美。LifeFormWare的员工录影surgery的部分很lost highway。最惊艳的桥段是第一场手术。
多给一星给大牌云集吧。N
堆砌概念和绝对柯南伯格的元素，通篇给人一种故弄玄虚的不适感，一种又高潮又没有高潮的感觉。
很想知道贺建奎的基因剪辑宝宝们现如今到底怎么样了！？片子让我很困扰的一点是，维果，一个在木兰花“催产床“控制下时不时长出奇怪器官的人，怎么能声称Lang（一具被改造过的躯体）“发明”了一个拥有自然生成的塑料消化系统的孩童是一个疯狂的想法？？？casting太不可🈲，本来就很干很单薄的幽默全被这些so called star拖累
柯南伯格还是一如既往以他高概念的世界观作为其创作核心，秉持着悲观的态度审视着地球上日新月异的技术革新。在前卫的设定下摆出一道人类未来宿命的论述题，“Surgery is the new sex ”，以维果汹涌而优柔的表演为主导的，是忠于行为艺术的纯粹践行者与探寻文明演化方式的传道士的自反过程，试图阐释激进的body horror与切割肉体带来的感官刺激放大鉴美的荒谬与潜在语境中媒体态度的失真。从工业文明出发，蕾雅与小k对身体态度的改变延伸至人体异化后的反噬，既是对自然伦理的挑战同时也是对旧有哲学思维的颠覆。饱含对资本垄断的批判倾向，是作为样本符号被政府用于收割的科技载体，在虚空中依附于进化的随机性与无序性，拥抱或是排斥那尚且残留的官能反射，回归欲望的容器，这是独属于柯南伯格寓言化的病理切片。
剧情设定挺高级，幻想未来没有生理痛苦的人类。
已经要八十岁的一代名导柯南伯格再次尝试了新类型的恐怖片，首先我必须膜拜导演的脑洞，不过作品也是肉眼可见的乏力，绕了很大一个圈子，如此邪典，如此夸张的阐述了一个道理——最初的才是最美的，不要随意改变自己的身体
后半部不显幼稚吗？？？（镜头真的太迂腐了，不被它拔出来-注意力落在几个角色之间失败的互动上-都不可能
虽然知道概念高级，但重口味的场景充斥整部电影，让人恶心了很久，然后发现它絮絮叨叨地说半天，并没有说出真正有趣的点，脑海里全是奇情画面，真的好吗？
当内在不再适应外部的改变时，革命是由身体内部开始的，这时几类人开始分野，主动谋求改变的（手术更改消化系统）；尚未自我觉醒的进化被动选择者（器官变异者）；旁观者（拍摄记者们）；将政治理解为行为艺术的狂热追随者们（可笑的耳朵）；把变革打上tattoo的政府中立监视者们；激进的暴力保守主义者。忒修斯之船行驶于文明和艺术的荒漠之中，定义粉碎并重建于痛苦带来的高潮与古老性爱的对撞之间。自我解剖是发现自我最赤裸裸的手段。
当内在不再适应外部的改变时，革命是由身体内部开始的，这时几类人开始分野，主动谋求改变的（手术更改消化系统）；尚未自我觉醒的进化被动选择者（器官变异者）；旁观者（拍摄记者们）；将政治理解为行为艺术的狂热追随者们（可笑的耳朵）；把变革打上tattoo的政府中立监视者们；激进的暴力保守主义者。忒修斯之船行驶于文明和艺术的荒漠之中，定义粉碎并重建于痛苦带来的高潮与古老性爱的对撞之间。自我解剖是发现自我最赤裸裸的手段。
Body is reality. Camera is guilty.
電影探討的，一是sex evolution，二是body evolution，三是social landscape及伴隨著的politics。我覺著小k飾演的角色有點可愛誒，在末世混沌裡誰才是工業社會的天啟四騎士？
终于到了现代“行为艺术家”对人体出手的年代了？行为艺术和生物进化的概念拼接缝合，加上劣质道具，器官特写和演员各自为政且显而易见满头雾水的做作表演，这片子真是变态和解读爱好者的狂欢
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
