Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
4. 子女都愿意赡养老人的
整体水准挺高，就是看到最后，怎么觉得像怂恿老人卖房，去合租公寓的宣传片。
节奏还行，故事离谱，属于不知道为什么要用这么强的卡司来演的剧本。虽然我很喜欢乌托邦，但实际如此乐观呈现，在现在的心态下还是觉得不太可取。真的担心养老的人，可以不必看。
而剧中媳妇正是被洗脑之人，在面对五十多年纪，二人双双失业而没有了经济来源，遂决定为了不支付妈妈养老院的费用，决定接来一起居住，而发生些啼笑皆非生活小插曲，让人纷纷看到正能量不断涌现。
挺有意思的～好喜欢老奶奶～～养老这么沉重的话题，能够用轻松诙谐的方法呈现，挺好的～
还不错的喜剧，天海祐希就是一束光，自然的美，再俗套的剧本都会因为她而不同，宝冢梗她自己说出来也真的很好笑，还有骗钱那段也超好笑，阿妈咪桑喜剧天赋已经点满了。
其实是sharehouse的广告吧 //编剧到底在做什么梦//4000万日元，约人民币202万，呵，我选择跳海。
给四星是基于两个社会问题点：1.日本目前很流行的生前葬礼。3.没有养老基金的个人如何选择养老模式，中年以后的工作不稳定和孤独终老导致的失落寂寞，是否可以有别的养老生活来焕发生命质感和精彩，有质量的合租房是一个很好方式。所谓抱团养老生活。
后半段还是挺温馨的。
一边看一边算汇率，这个东西换算成人民币多少钱，那个东西换算过来多少钱吧啦吧啦一大堆。等看完了看着手边一堆记录，为啥要算呢？焦虑啊、zg和日本的社会形态越来越像了，等再过些年，会不会也经济不振呢、未来的某一天我会不会也跟他们一样为了几十块钱而犯愁呢？想想都可怕啊😱
就这么说吧，单就日本社会，养老金没有一方面是存款不足，二来是政府出不起钱。
改动好大……好多冗余的情节……好奇日本的share house真的是那样的吗？🤔
前面已经够难看了，直到看到最后发现是个两小时超长合租房广告 我的表情be like:😅 导演和编剧你们在干嘛
有点类似于贺岁片，老面孔汇聚一堂，剧情皆大欢喜
有些点还是很幽默的，比如说像你就进不了宝冢。年近60还要再出发真的不是另一个版本的从头再来吗？太难为人了，不犯众怒嘛。
虽然女王和叔都是我喜欢的演员，但是这种题材怎么能拍的这么假这么混淆视听呢。。。做什么老年化政策推广么。。
把名字换一下，这不都是中国的事儿吗，哈哈哈，故事很有意思，最终还是要有点正能量，也符合日本一贯的风格。
笑死，棺材打折是对佛祖不尊重。 结局的合租不评论，毕竟社会背景不同。 家人相处，少些猜忌多些关爱这倒是真的。人在死后什么都听不见了，还不如生前让大家把话讲出来欢乐地一聚。
想不到出手阔绰吃饭从来不看价格的小五郎沦落到了每天只能吃猪肉豆芽菜火锅（不是）。
很有趣的喜剧。不过和养老金其实没什么关系就是了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
