Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
刚开始一直压住配乐，还以为索伦蒂诺终于要朴实真诚一把了，结果好家伙，原来是为了给结尾攒个大的。直男版《85盛夏》，后半段又俗又腻，没有《85盛夏》那么做作的结构，但《上帝之手》却彻底陷入了无话可说的境地，索伦蒂诺以”个人经历“为免死金牌，将活生生的人和城市压成了标本书签，实在让人怀疑导师洋洋洒洒的那一大段教诲，他到底有没有听进去……
那个夏天，我告别了童真
刚开始一直压住配乐，还以为索伦蒂诺终于要朴实真诚一把了，结果好家伙，原来是为了给结尾攒个大的。直男版《85盛夏》，后半段又俗又腻，没有《85盛夏》那么做作的结构，但《上帝之手》却彻底陷入了无话可说的境地，索伦蒂诺以”个人经历“为免死金牌，将活生生的人和城市压成了标本书签，实在让人怀疑导师洋洋洒洒的那一大段教诲，他到底有没有听进去……
对于索伦蒂诺来说太简单、太理所当然了，他应该比这好得多。
前半部分还是很美的，后半部分急转直下得让人忍不住刷手机
镜头运动不羁，散文风格的结构，温暖舒适的影调。极具个人风格的影片。
2022-2-28. 始终呆在洗手间的姐姐，总在楼下抽烟的马里奥，温柔体贴的哥哥，楼上敲5次地板的男爵夫人，偶遇的著名导演，梦想开近海船的走私犯，以及一群奇奇怪怪的亲戚...从热爱马拉多纳到放弃马拉多纳，在所有人的帮助下，男主终于完成了一个少年的成长。
都有一个无法忘却的夏天。在观看过的影像中，那不勒斯快成我的意大利故乡了。
未来会怎么样，我不知道。
你不能垮掉，而我也准备好跟过去这一年告别了。
欲望啊，欲望哟，欲望。似乎欲望总是驱动着男性感知一切，创造一切，又逃避一切的钥匙。但索伦蒂诺厉害的是，他承认欲望，不讳欲望。毕竟我们每个人，对每件事，都是先被表象与本能吸引，然后才能随时间慢慢体悟出背后的真知，不是吗？“人人都想拍电影，但你有勇气吗？”这才是振聋发聩的灵魂拷问。像当初《绝美之城》一样，这部电影，我可能也要再过几年，才能看的更懂一点。但我依旧着迷于他对生活与众生的描述，喜悦与悲恸总是那么毫无预兆地穿插交替。而与每个人生路上重要旅伴的邂逅，他也总能提炼出那些最至关重要的，寥寥数笔便还原出最鲜活的情绪。人生总是那么五味杂陈啊，而电影，“没什么作用，但能帮你逃离现实”。所以，“告诉我，你有故事要说吗？”希望我能记住，我有故事要说
展望过去同时也想让观众代入过去，但这私人么？人生中拍的每部电影不需要全部是绝对的诗意。大家都活得这么认真，有意思么？
费里尼说：电影其实没什么用，但它能分散注意力，从现实中，现实很糟糕。
就好比《罗马》之于阿方索·卡隆，《贝尔法斯特》之于肯尼思·布拉纳一样，这是属于保罗·索伦蒂诺的乡愁，还挺喜欢这种私人化的电影的，因为能跟着导演走一遭他过去的经历，其实挺有意思的。电影充斥着一股忧伤的浪漫，有点call me by your name的感觉，唯一的遗憾是配乐始终不及《绝美之城》动听。
“不要垮掉。”
7.0 《阿玛柯德》的开头，费里尼式的女性人物，成长故事，自传性质。剧本松弛、随意，节奏较差。马拉多纳。
电影嵌套电影，模糊了虚拟与现实的界限。透过镜头窥见那不勒斯的风土人情和导演本人苦乐交织的成长回忆。情欲、足球、家庭、死亡、性启蒙、故乡，人生需要多次“破处”，不谙世事的少年陡然成人，坐进火车踏上电影导演的新路程。前一个半小时沉闷欲弃，后四十分钟宛若新生。暮色霭霭笼罩的蓝色大海，纯净的哀伤扑面而来，生发掩面饮泣的冲动，想到成长总是这么极为相似。电影是逃离现实的媒介，电影是生活的罩壳，“通过我进入苦难之城，通过我进入永恒的痛苦，通过我你就能在迷失的人群中穿行”，伤口在冒血，艺术在萌芽，事后一根烟，“我”就这样长大，怀抱破碎的心，扎进未知的远方。一个导演一生中能拍出这样一部电影还有什么遗憾的呢？（ps：小提琴配乐很棒）
意大利的Vesuvio和Napoli真美啊，好想去
意大利小哥哥好帅，但后半部分就emmmm，都在看景。
他的脸比甜茶生动。索伦蒂诺的阳光灿烂日子。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
