Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
但好不容易拍代孕这类片子
结局强行圆满
女主代孕，快生的时候说唐氏综合征，美国夫妇跑了。女主扛着未婚、生育、宗教的压力生了下来。孩子没事，养到4岁，美国夫妇又回来要带走孩子……
就……除了基情和服装没什么亮点，麒麟下跪和小闪找爸爸都尴尬死了……邓布利多家也就剩阿不福思一个能背锅了是吧所以是他，不过演员的美颜可圈可点吸溜
动物戏有点少，幸好糟老头恋爱戏也不是特别多，而且该发的糖全发了，虽然节奏还是有点儿拖，但比第二部有趣。中段，我一度怀疑他们跑去柏林，只是编剧觉得比起其他国家，还是让德国群众和德国魔法部长来当这种刻板印象恶人群体比较不会被骂（就是说，什么时候日本人在好莱坞也能安排上这种刻板印象？）PS麒麟和某刘姓候选人工具感好重……
代孕真的考验人性 不是每一孕母都能那么幸运
冗长乏味，毫无重点，唯有六个箱子触动了七个波特的回忆。
我理解也不完全理解
不错的阿三片。小孩生母鹰钩鼻斗鸡眼。霉国的确坑人。
和《变形金刚》系列一样，属于那种非常稳定的，一部比一部难看的东西。
結局强行大團圓升華主題沒什麽意思
8分。非常好看的印度片。代孕的各方面矛盾都轻松搞笑的展现了，唯一不足可能就是结尾太理想化了，但这是大家喜闻乐见的。女主很漂亮。
5.阿不思弟弟出现在hp已经是长年独身了，原来在这有段过去
看的过程还是很享受，魔法世界，一些小彩蛋，像多年的朋友。剧情弱到不需要说了，完全无意义。只有结尾像是熟悉的味道。所有人欢聚，而邓布利多独自一人走向街头。所有人敬你，崇拜你，甚至恐惧你，但有谁还在爱你。
如果每次都惊艳于印度电影的题材 那本身就是一种偏见
以轻喜剧的方式讲述代孕这个灰色地带的故事，较为完整，探讨也较深，结尾升华了主题。
2021年印度电影《如获至宝》又叫《代孕风波》是一部节奏明快，载歌载舞充满喜剧的故事片。女主角咪咪是个身材健美、面容娇好的舞者，最大的梦想就是去孟买当明星，无奈囊中羞涩，无法成行。这时一对美国夫妇来到印度求人代孕，在一个善良但贪婪的出租车司机巴努促成下他们达成交易。故事情节波波折折，结尾让人意想不到。看完电影后让我知道了，如果所有孤儿组成一个国家，其人口将居世界第9位，超过1.53亿儿童，需要父母照顾。其实能生孩子的可以做父母，不能生孩子的也可以做父母，生了孩子的不是自己的也可以做父母。
我在看什么
4.也许可以称为神奇动物之碟中碟吧…
这片其实点出了代孕的最大问题，但结局却又糊弄了过去。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
