6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful.
A brilliant and outragously funny satire of society, 7 December 1999
Author: Dave Joerg ([email protected])
"Flodder" is one of the funniest movies ever made and few people realise that it is a Dutch movie made by none other than the Holland version of John Carpenter, the famous Dick Maas, author and director of the thriller "Amsterdamned". The Flodder family is the reincarnation of the term a-social. When the whole family bunch, basically all bastards, criminals and sluts must be relocated from their City slum because of toxic waste under their house, the city council house no choice. The only available space is in the "Zoendal" - the "Sun Valley" the best area in Amsterdam where all doctors, snobs and businessmen can afford to live their lives. And where the central point of interest and politics is the tennis club of the community. The Flodder family brings devastation to the tranquil world that ruled before. They are simply unbelievable. The characterisation is incredibly funny, beginning with Ma Flodder who searches other people's trash cans for food or making illegal liquor in her cellar and ending with the eldest daughter who is the biggest slut on earth. Together they make the most horrible family imaginable, a sort of immoral mirror image to the Brady Bunch or the Waltons. When the City counsel of Amsterdam hoped that the Flodders would show their good will to be more civilised in their new area, it turns out that Holland's most famous family would rather bring out the worst in the rich people of "Sun Valley"-wonderland. The rest is a hilarious, brilliant and well made social satire that can be watched as a provocative movie as well as a straightforward comedy. Dick Maas at his best. I salute him! Flooder was the Dutch smash hit in 1986 and brought two sequels and a tv series. All of the sequels were nice but not as great as the original.
Flodders (1986) is available on DVD in Germany in a dubbed German version in Dolby Digital 5.1. under the name:
"Flodders -Eine Familie zum knutschen"
Why is First Floor Features, the producer of the movie not bringing the Dick Maas blockbusters out on DVD in the Netherlands, I wonder. The are not even available on video there. These movies have so much potential, still to this day and have a huge silent but true following.
【1.5】轻而易举地拍一部陈词滥调出来，很难不怀疑是枝裕和是为了公款旅游。暂时不想认为是他如今水平仅限于此。
是枝裕和怎么这么拉了，如此轻佻的剧本，真是几乎找不到一点好
哈哈，《小偷家族》和《无人知晓》又好在哪儿了呢？
尼古拉斯凯奇的电影总感觉不看后悔，看了更后悔，但我依然一如既往的爱着他，期盼着他能崛起。
算是小偷家族姊妹篇，一个骗子家族的故事，都是边缘人凑成的临时家庭，都在人性的善与恶之间摇摆，但基本是全方位的倒退，整个特别拧巴，也更俗套，把拐卖儿童美化成这样，让人完全无法接受。饼叔靠着近几年最不起眼的一次表演拿下了人生最重要的一个奖，估计自己都觉得懵。
創作上重複和原地踏步了十幾年的是枝裕和這次露怯得厲害，投影展所好的劇情卻編織得想像不到的潦草，全員聖母的故事反倒令人感到了濃濃的虛假和偽善。
杀人判三年也是够轻的。今天汇率一千万韩元兑51000人民币。
剧本散成一盘，时时莫名其妙。女主到底在演什么？
相比较是枝裕和之前的作品，《掮客》只能算做「平庸之作」。移植韩语的「水土不服」+碎裂的剧本完全无法支撑「温情」冲天的概念化设定。所有的「细腻」看起来都很刻意，无论人物设定亦或表演都平淡到「一无是处」（宋康昊演技OK，但此番绝对够不上影帝水准。许是有IU毫无感情的表演衬托，才凸显出其演技之「出神入化」）。想必是枝导演还无法走出《小偷家族》的「阴霾」，「畏首畏尾」的模式化与工整化做派几乎充斥着整部影片，所以无法感动也就在情理之中了。不禁感叹，原来一个「工整」的是枝裕和居然能如此「乏味」，毫无惊喜。（一星给主题，一星给表演，两星给情怀）
这个概念无疑是好的
确实有理由怀疑，立足于异国的是枝裕和，担心被扣上“韩黑”的骂名，于是以浪漫化表达来拍韩国童话。一手好牌，宋康昊、裴斗娜是演技派塔尖，IU是偶像派塔尖，往哪打都有风险。模板化的不仅是导演，还有IU，还是那个保持脸黑又始终偶像的她，隔着一公里看她上楼梯都带着MV质感。
不要在說教煽情了啦，2022了老師，拼裝家族這一套真的不是很奏效了，簡直是童話世界的夢幻家庭，大家都有夠善良和善的，最後女刑警的轉變也是很無力。演員也沒有那麼撐得起來故事，真是遺憾
终于不是烂片了，而且是有预算的。中年人看来真的演不了战斗片了。精彩度虽然一般，但故事底子是很好的
虽然不能成为合法受保护的家庭 但各种形式上的责任分摊与舍我付出早已超越血缘了
早期的是枝裕和更多还是偏重东方家庭的慢慢悠长，这几年导演的作品反而更多偏重于社会性议题，特别是小偷家族后更甚。
和之前的烂片比，是强了好多，不过也就是有点意思罢了。帕丁顿熊2我感觉比第一部差多了。还有电影最后又上演了，对方还没追上来，但非要以赢得时间为由，留下送人头地戏码。
是《小偷家族》的延续，但缺乏相当程度的共情。
是枝裕和到韩国旅游，吃了饭逛了街，遇到几个韩国演员，随手画了几张速写。
是枝裕和的影像基调仿佛在“无生命”的状态下注入一针小剂量的艾司唑仑，看似噤若寒蝉，实则包罗万象。1.比以往的作品大大提升了影像构图，强调了场景内时间与空间的统一度。一方面借助了场面调度和画面造型成功抓住观众的注意力，另一方面提供亲近而又独特的视角最大限度地让观众一边体验一边观察。2.在一整个封闭且杂乱的车内戏与屋内戏中，场面调度可以实现日常大家庭的流动性，这类流动性来自于每一个长镜头中都设置至少三个人物，人物的位置前后错落，动作也是互有交流，整个画面的内容是极其丰富的能在封闭的空间内实现乱中有序的优雅。3.是枝裕和的场面调度能够在每一个画框中都完整的发生一个故事，其中没有切断全体画面，转去某一个说话者 的“打断式”叙述，镜头调度都是以平视、中近景， 宛如家人一般视角去观察这个家里发生的一切。
“姓名”无法界定身份和归属——是枝裕和用这样的暗喻试图合理化他走向国际的创作路径，但他无法淡化强烈的作者印记。这个“韩国”故事看起来不够韩国，之所以成立，依然要感谢人类社会共同相信的某种普世价值体系。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
