A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
主观评分8+
不错，虽然有些稚嫩，这个时代紧抓在地风味是很符合大众审美的，立意上隐约有些瑕疵，似乎想要批判却又小心翼翼，时代剧变之下的家庭伦理，在慢慢消解的过程中确实不会摧枯拉朽，作为家庭中心的妈妈，在评判新儿媳的眼神之中与自己和解，这块的转变却不够说服力，差了点力气
只要拍电影用心，何愁观众不走心呢？女主的脸让我出戏，扣一星。
第一次看讲潮汕方言的电影，因为二姐夫是潮汕人，对潮汕地区的文化有一点了解，所以就像看到我二姐的生活似的，拍得真好，值得一看，特别是想对潮汕文化了解的就一定要看。
潮汕人觉得很真实，演得也真的很自然。最后妈妈在飞机上眼眶含泪说“你妈是不是很没用”的时候真的我也看哭了。
“可是现实没有那么多喜剧”来自我一个来自潮汕的朋友。
带妈妈去看的，从小到大一听有人说潮阳话就乐
很真实，也很温暖 最近特别喜欢这种淡淡的情感剧本 很高兴听到好久以前喜欢过的宝藏乐队玩具船长的音乐 ~
片子看完还是很欣慰，结局是圆满的，不过还没有刻意的煽动感情的俗套镜头。
优点在于细节捕捉的很好 演员演技自然 缺点也是这个 呈现了一部分的生活片段 但却没有升华 结尾转折有点尴尬。。最后感慨一句 潮汕婆婆确实厉害。。
水鸡兄出来也算给了我们一种小惊喜。
后半段出乎意料地放在了妈妈的视角，处理得很好，不徐不漫，细腻温柔，表演也是“土”得恰到好处
最近方言电影四方兴起甚好 文化多元的基础就是方言 虽然我全程没怎么带入 但现场的潮汕观众笑的前仰后合 先说影片的优点 潮汕渔村的民风展示与几组平行剪辑带出的潮汕社会生态（雨天 卤味 小生意人 海外关系 邻居关系）特别是基本承包全片笑点的龅牙阿姨 日常拌嘴都是比较有灵气的地方 此外影片也比较委婉地展现了潮汕独有的婚前“男尊女卑”婚后独尊母上的特殊形态 借着潮汕背景编导开的这一点保守玩笑基本也在可接受范围内 不过电影的问题还是比较大的 总结下来可以归为过于原生态的平铺直叙 无论是表演还是导演的手法 都太平了 从模仿久石让的配乐就可以感受到编导想要模仿日韩系小清新的治愈风格 可实际呈现上对于生活缺少一个再发现的二度创作过程 剧本太顺拐了 在传统与现代的冲突讨论上 甚至是低配版《摘金奇缘》
咿咿呀呀的潮汕话
配乐选择得很好，很贴合潮汕风情。
电影两星，一星致不断探索进步的主创团队。哪个潮汕人不希望出现像《爱情神话》《火锅英雄》一样的方言电影呢？潮汕文化在当下大众舆论处于一个有相对狭窄偏见的状态，“牛肉火锅”“重男轻女”“婚姻排外”等等，主创团队有心呈现并击破这些，于是选了一个高烈度的题材，这特别值得夸赞，但无奈剧本单薄、表达浮于表面、部分镜头更是让人大跌眼镜，最让人难以接受的是，“相亲胖妹”和“小舅的黑人女友”角色标签，除了满足主创的恶趣味，只会强化偏见。往小了说，潮汕电影可以反映现实问题和个体在代际之间的抉择，往大了说，我觉得潮汕电影，应该承担起呈现和引导建立新传统的责任。
也可以透过表象的问题，看出一个更深层次的事实。
虽然很平凡的故事，但是看得又笑又哭，转头一看，我妈也看得又笑又哭。我大潮汕人看起来真的好亲切，很多俚语俗语，真的要会讲潮汕话才更加好像有。
妈妈好可爱，好多场景都有一种看似臭脸实则憨憨的可爱。
双重屏幕：一段爱情（拍片）
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
