Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
简直匪夷所思。什么时候家长会允许孩子们带一个大型ai立体智能手机去上学，还全程直播？巴尼拿到有暴力倾向的小白不害怕吗？都上中学了还不会交朋友，人类的天性呢？最后居然真的以为ai可以帮助人交朋友，这不就是从智能手机升级到电子宠物吗？90后的童年孤独就是从电子宠物开始的，一旦开始就不会回头了。
超可爱的b-bot，却映射出人类单向索取情感的自私和科技巨头只想赚钱的嘴脸哈哈哈。以及细想有点恐惧（和讽刺），以后的人类已经不需要真人朋友了，不再需要真实的生活，不再面对面交流分享，人类终于“进化”（或者被替代）成了一行行代码，实现了某种意义上的永生？
虽然剧情一般，但风靡全片的想象力与创造力也是很好的加分项。
心底却比从前更加地漠然与孤独。
把虚假当真实，把囚笼当自由，娱乐至死。
学校里面孩子们拷贝解锁机器人限制是高潮，之后感觉就趋于平淡了
机器人已经代替手机成为孩子们社交和连接的基本工具，但巴尼的这台却因为故障变得行为异常。《天赐灵机》讲得就是巴尼与故障机器人间友谊的故事。
有趣的故事，可惜结尾不是很喜欢。即使我们再孤僻黑暗，这世界也会有一盏光只为你而亮。
也许是之前的错觉，男主仿佛小甜茶，以为是个基片，结果是个私人电影。比《贝尔法斯特》好上许多，但也感觉稍微差一口气。结尾的玻璃反射和CMBYN最后的壁炉戏一样都很考验男主表演，虽然这里弱了一些，肯定是不如🍑片那样能直接提名影帝。但斯科蒂还是很可爱的，和甜茶一样都展示了美臀。以及没太懂小修士是什么存在，但最后告别竟然出现，真的太可爱了，你会相信他给你带来了好运。
孤独有啥的，孤独你就能当导演搞艺术啊？谁他妈不孤独？切。（大概酱。）
越是依赖网络越孤独，不再单纯是一个工具，相互喜欢陪伴，把互动建立在现实世界的伙伴，才是真正的朋友。
还可以吧，用机器人反应了现实生活中还是有很多人依赖科技来交朋友，往往忽略了现实当中的关系
Napoli è una città misteriosa, mai visto una città così caotica ma anche così elegante.
天上掉下个傻缺机，傻缺机治好了全球孩子的缺友症，然后卒
故事比较俗套，包装的算不上有趣，概念也一般。互联网时代下娱乐至死，被科技支配后的返璞归真。老生常谈了，情感上很难更深的共鸣。
友情向电影永远的神啊啊啊啊啊！！！！太好看啦😭！！我永远喜欢谈友情的作品！！！妈的，Ron太可爱了，特别是他的那个微笑，妈的，治愈整个世界，可爱到宇宙爆炸😭。很喜欢主角的配音，完全就是十五六岁还没变声的小男孩的那种声音，可爱死了。意外的也很喜欢Ricky这家伙也好萌😭。妈的看的我可激动，友情是双向的哇！电影的插曲也很好听😭那个混音的家伙匿名鼠3笑死我了，完全就是死老鼠5吧🤣。电影不是特别好看，有点乱乱的感觉，但是也不错！话说其实我觉得这还是有点恐怖片的。。让我们断开网络，去现实世界拥抱真正的友情吧😭。
我真的没有看懂，我不理解小姨手中攥着的电池，我不理解男主父母之间的口哨，我不理解小修士是个啥？我不理解"近海船的声音…
34分钟弃，为了留住自己的有暴力倾向潜在杀人犯的机器人不惜把无辜的机器人粉碎的男主，我忍不了。还有简介上说巴尼是一个有着社交障碍的中学生，我看他挺勇的啊，主动和好多人说话。要是他算社交障碍，那我就是植物人了。
索伦蒂诺的私人影像，这是属于他的《痛苦与荣耀》。关于成长和前行，关于与过去和解，关于找寻自我和接受自我，那不勒斯少年悲喜交加的成长回忆构成了故事的基础。对我来说，除了引用的费里尼的那句话，好像没有其他让我印象更为深刻的记忆点了。(摄影和构图都极为出色。
看到Ron主动要求上传网络时，我大为震惊，还以为这是打算致敬攻壳了，结果果然是我想多了。感觉本片可以干脆改名叫《迪士尼群嘲FB和苹果，并自称他们才是孩子的好朋友》。影片揪着库克痛批监控技术与逐利资本，但又仔细为技术开脱——“它只是被资本不当利用了”——最后宣扬【被爱感化过的技术】是至善至美的希望，是人性的拯救者。然而由Barney独立建模调教，名为【Ron】的深度学习算法，不就是传（敛）教（财）全世界的迪士尼的化身？这无非是在自我标榜：唯有以IP寓教于乐的迪士尼才是善良技术和善良资本，可以带给孩子们真正的欢乐与陪伴。哦这让我想起另外一位slogan是“更多欢乐更多选择”的老伙计。建议这次也可以考虑搭配麦当劳开心乐园餐，开卖合作款Ron玩具。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
