Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
整体不如前两部，最好看是《鸭先知》，有那个年代的感觉，好笑。其次是《诗》，后半部分的诗写的不错，画面也像诗了。最后沈腾笑点不多。
小格局思维又想拍大格局故事，拍的就很硬，篇幅再长可能缺点会更多，现在这样就还行吧。没惊喜也没失望。
徐峥部分有点意思，不过也是因为运镜和叙事明显看出了许多名作的影子
看哭了，章子怡那一段，这么多年了她还和《我的父亲母亲》里一样
20211004 就对徐峥这一段有感觉，其他都一般，沈腾那段像红旗广告，电量持久！总体徐峥>其他三位=一样！🇨🇳
《少年行》和《乘风》都半斤八两，沈腾第一次导演的短剧水平一般，吴京强行煽情搞抗日片审美疲劳，是减分项了。
章子怡=徐峥＞沈腾＞吴京
国庆三部曲中的第三部，和前两部同样的叙述套路，四个短片四个时代，连接过去和未来。吴京的《乘风》，开始我以为最后结局肯定就是父亲为救儿子牺牲的老套故事来点题，结果却打脸了，忽然才发觉电影标题是我的父辈，而并不是我的父亲，意境一下子就高起来了。《诗》的片头出现国际章的名字时本来我是不抱希望的，结果竟然让我流了这么多眼泪，但是万万没想到的是，到这里已经就是整部电影的巅峰了。《鸭先知》全篇就和冬冬的笑脸一样，油腻感都快整个溢出屏幕了。《少年行》的沈腾本来是我最期待的，结果也是我最失望的，首先广告植入太多太硬，严重影响观影体验，更重要的是，在国庆三部曲这种电影里如此硬植入广告实在不妥，剧情更是尤其的乏味，令人犯困。
吴京还是拍的一样热血硬朗，但是剧情线凌乱无序，不算合格；章子怡首次执导算不错，温婉如玉，还真似一首娓娓道来的诗歌，以后可以走文艺路线；沈腾还是熟悉的麻花团队加持，笑点满分，放在压轴合家欢很合适。最让人惊喜的当属徐峥，经过前两次群像影片的过渡，这次的短片拿捏到位，鸭先知整个画风、构图、演绎都是非常棒的，虽然隐隐能看到安德森、卓别林等众多大师的影子，但本土化的尝试还是恰到好处，值得推荐！
徐峥那个好，喜欢喜剧风。沈腾那个想象力也行。
以时间为顺序，串联起捍卫疆土、自强不息、市场发展、科技未来四篇，将“父辈”这一延续性的概念直通当下与未来。演员转型导演，暴露出导演功力的欠缺，但比较聪明的是能以优势藏拙。吴京篇是“父辈的抉择”，动作场面血性十足、调度成熟，父子生死为悬念反转，不过文戏方面铺垫反转的目的性太强。章子怡篇是“父辈的牺牲”，结尾诗篇升华将离场感提升一个档次，但是堆砌情境、滥用闪回、人物转变依靠口述暴露了剧本推进动力的不足。徐峥篇是“父辈的创造”，是最为轻盈流畅的篇章。但是风格化的包装停留在表面，人物和剧作停留在舒适区里，赶工痕迹明显，“小聪明”过多。沈腾篇结尾点题是有巧思的，有继承也有回望。笑点令人发笑，但是整体太过琐碎拼凑，喜剧人欢聚一堂也只是过场，没有能够立得住的人物。
还是有被感动到，每代人有每代人的不易，不要太自怨自艾。章子怡很知道自己擅长演又苦又倔的角色。鸭先知＞诗＞吴京=沈腾
从战争年代到现代社会，两代人的传承，虽然四个故事都各有缺点，但也都不错地诠释了每个时代的特点。
是让死亡渺小的东西
只有章子怡的片段比较感人（虽说拍得很稚嫩，技术很一般，不过摄影音乐不错），结尾的诗之前看文字稿没触动，章子怡黄轩一念出来一下子就被感动了。徐峥的这次喜欢不起来，模仿韦斯安德森元素是唯一亮点。不过全片最佳当属王菲的主题曲。
还是徐峥的单元拍得最好，搞笑又有电影感又有情怀。还用了韦斯安德森的风格。章子怡整体制作水准高，尤其是配乐！
虽然是按时间顺序展开的四个故事，但是风格迥异得实在衔接不上。反而最喜欢章子怡导的「诗」，六七十年代滤镜下的小家庭故事最能打动我。徐峥的其次，沈腾最烂。
三部曲里最套路的一部。唯二的亮点就是王菲的片尾曲和《诗》中的那首诗。鸭先知的故事比较接地气，还算有趣。把无数父辈抽象出了最特别的那一代，并不能让大众产生足够共鸣。从这个角度来说，父辈天生比不过家乡和祖国。
“有国才有家，家是最小国，国是最大家”，爱国不一定是宏大叙事，爱家爱人才是爱国的最高诠释。除去开心麻花的part，应该是国庆三部曲里最好的一部了
诗可以，里面的小孩比韩昊霖演得自然多了。雄鹰展翅 黑虎掏心 我笑死 这一篇小孩也不错。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
