Ten years ago, Ginny (Toni Gonzaga), an Architecture student, and Marco (Piolo Pascual), a History professor, began a one-of-a-kind and unpredictable love story. In the five years that they were together, they brought out the best in each other, which included Marco's unrealized dream of becoming a chef. Together, they worked towards their dream of opening up a restaurant, but when Ginny realized her own pursuits were different from his, she rejected his wedding proposal and left the country for a Masters degree in Architecture. At present, Ginny co-owns a one-stop Architecture and Interior Design firm specializing in Restoration. She receives an email from Marco, which was written and sent after their break-up, meant to be read four years later. It makes her feel even more regretful of leaving the love of her life. When their firm receives an offer to restore an old house into a restaurant, she is ecstatic to learn that Marco will be co-owning the restaurant. She takes this as a sign...
话题尖锐,但节奏太慢了,在女性议题之外还想加入新闻伦理、网络暴力之类的话题,但都蜻蜓点水,反倒冲淡了主题,完全没必要加。
姐姐对妹妹的爱 到这种地步 真的是可以了 长兄如父 姐如母啊..
太催泪了。扎實,情感刻劃和表达,完全滿分。女主雖然遭遇不幸,氣氛壓郁,但全劇充滿愛和掙扎、人文關怀。
介于3-4星之间,桑德拉·布鲁克已经很努力了
女性被强奸可能一生都活在痛楚中,而那些强奸犯却换张嘴脸继续好好活着。都看到了吧,不,他们熟视无睹。
墙中鞋,奶油饼,大衣甜甜圈, life goes on 之罪,更生人不易;Sandra Bullock 演技有点厉害,“惩罚者”和“金并”都好友善
韩国有熔炉法案 今后印度会不会有星期四法案
“Emotion can be an asset”
这个话题值得一看 内容略显不够紧凑扎实,警察都不知道里面几个人几把枪犯罪动机就敢冲 也是够虎
一方面剧情狗血,一方面女主深沉内敛的表演和人物性格,真的一点割裂。尤其是镜头语言上突然的暖光突然的虚化,真的就是风格不统一。
女性平权问题任重道远啊
虽然有着差不多的结构和叙事
作为一部电影,也许并不够出色,悬念、转折也没有特别吸引人,但其中的社会意义却是无法用艺术价值来衡量的,有着十分强大的能量。衷心希望这部电影能够推动社会进步,让女性在印度、在世界无需再受不必要的伤害。三星。
但该电影绝大部分都放在博弈上
真是压抑啊,情感被压着,行为也被法律压制。怎么办,生活还是要继续的。
多让人肃然起敬!
用错误的手段来达到正义的目的,这可不值得提倡哦~
最后说保险二十年没打开,强奸犯夺了抢枪也没开火,最后咋说今天开了保险了?而且印度强奸的问题,这都知道,还是民众的问题,素质不高,女性地位,报案率低等等,但前面一个半小时都在吊胃口,最后就这?孩子是无辜的啊……而且动不动就要跟领导人说话,几十亿人,总理忙死也不够用啊,剧情真的太弱了
打完七发子弹,换弹夹,很真实!
看得是很热血没错了,女主也很酷。但是按理说,官方一般应该是不跟“犯罪分子”谈判的吧,示范作用后遗症无穷。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved