Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
哥俩一个比一个暴躁，嗓门一个赛一个大，吵得脑袋疼。剧情无力吐槽，也就爆炸追车看个热闹。
你以为它是灾难片，其实它是科幻片；你以为它是科幻片，其实它是恐怖片；你以为它是恐怖片，其实它是科教片。所以它到底是什么片？家庭为大，地下飙车太空飙飞船，俊男靓女……没错，它就是速度与激情番外篇之我炸月球救地球！
虽然设定上有点幼稚，然后画面上还不够精细，但片子拍得还可以。
别的不说，这应该是鸽王SLS第一次出现在好莱坞大片里吧？
理论过于疯狂，等于是抛弃了常识，凭空虚构，地球不是人类的起源，月球是个巨型结构体，是人类祖先保存火种的最后防御，人工智能要把人类赶尽杀绝，信息过于庞杂，现实被无情推翻，KC听着哈珀的解释一脸懵，观众直接就懵到冒烟儿了。
学到一句话 It's better ask forgiveness than permission. 与其请求允许，不如请求原谅
把天煞和2012混搭，结尾再加个火星任务，很保底的东西。俩类型混搭确实拖累了文戏，地球部分完全可以不要，每个人的动机都不怎么扎实；外星AI毁灭人类设定，即传统又管用，形同质量效应；室内淹水这种东西还是狭窄空间玩得起来。CG方面提供了不错的奇观，涌起的海面与月球内部，穿球什么的，虽不是新东西也算是效果有所提高了
场面很好，剧情有硬伤，忍忍吧，今年实在没什么大场面的片子。
后面的胡编乱造让我开始理解为什么还有人相信地平说、登月是谎言之类的论调，毕竟，月球上的洞再深再黑，也抵不过人类脑洞的无底无限。
要在影院看的科幻灾难片，特效五星。月球要砸在地球上，这脑洞巨物爱好狂喜。剧情虽然简单浦东还是够用了。地球是远古人类的新窝，月球是中央处理器，设定真牛哈哈，可是框架有细节却糊弄了点，人物多且平，和星穿差很多。很多桥段都老套，胖子教授是sam.还有个中国保姆……不过只有美国拯救，没其他国家啥事，地球的各种指挥也挺傻的。图一乐
Bug很多，想法也很老土，大杂燴亂炖：從阿諾《終結者》就開始的電子叛变导致的世界毁灭，連虫子怪形象也是抄了《寂静之地》（ A Quiet Place），不过，不妨碍我看得津津有味。了解了洛希极限、潮汐鎖定，看到了戴森球（片中是人類前文明時的一個环）⋯⋯科幻片再爛，也總能帶給我一點新東東。
疫情期间可看的不多，还是给女票看困了。预告片看完基本剧情就都知道了。对话过多，推动情节乏力，手持拍摄镜头过多……emm是不是应该看精灵旅社4来着
这片的难得之处是囊括了近年几乎所有好莱坞受验证的流行娱乐元素，包括不仅限于：种族起源、戴森球、政治隐喻、机械降神。表现手法上，前半段看起来很有《不要抬头》的白化版本，中部开始是《2012》那种黑压压和无处可逃的久违氛围，最后也能窥见怪兽电影和科幻电影的经典配方（飙车那段有点《速激》的内味儿）。刨去因为剪辑导致的逻辑衔接或众口难调的确存在褒贬不一，品质方面：规格和特效兼具、节奏口感尚可、情感刻画不油腻、亚裔和拉丁配角各司其职（于文文的演技和定位都要比《金刚》里的景甜实在不少）。仅能将如此多元素整合到一起，就足够称得上是难得能娱乐大众的爆米花佳作。太可惜没能去电影院一睹恢弘场面...
理论上这种投资级别的片子，还是应该给个特效的分，但这片子我连夸特效都夸不出口，一想到美国人整天花这么多钱拍些垃圾反智片来恶心我们，就特别想吐🤮
2022年，还能在大荧幕上看到罗兰·艾默里奇的正宗灾难片，要啥自行车，加一星。戴森球与阴谋论科学家也算推陈出新。如果不点明“外星人”的身份就好了，就当他们是《普罗米修斯》中的工程师。2020年新冠疫情后所有好莱坞个人英雄主义电影自动降2星，老头子没变，是观众变了。
各种拍摄角度你都能找到迈克尔贝对当年自己【勇闯夺命岛】，【绝地战警】的致敬，然时过境迁，他这套已经变成了工业流程，当年热血新人导演的惊艳已经荡然无存，除了公路追逐老套的炸炸炸，唯一能让你意识到这部电影产于2022年的代表是满屏的无人机环绕拍摄，看一次觉得有点新鲜，看多了就觉得电影被切的稀碎。距离迈克尔贝首执导筒轰然出世的【绝地战警1】已经过了27年，可能人老了，总是要怀旧的，爆炸贝也不例外，ps 片长2小时完全没必要，1个半小时足够
迈克尔贝还是没有改掉自己的坏习惯 剧本完全不打磨 完全靠爆破视听和特效撑起整部电影 为了一个接一个的大场面不得不塞一些无趣又没意义的剧情 倒数杰克吉伦哈尔在反派的路上越走越远越演越上瘾 其他角色相比而言就极为单一简单脸谱化 迈克尔贝在这条邪门歪道上有些走火入魔了
一次野蛮的视觉轰炸，不带脑子看的很过瘾。
理论过于疯狂，等于是抛弃了常识，凭空虚构，地球不是人类的起源，月球是个巨型结构体，是人类祖先保存火种的最后防御，人工智能要把人类赶尽杀绝，信息过于庞杂，现实被无情推翻，KC听着哈珀的解释一脸懵，观众直接就懵到冒烟儿了。
6分。2012+独立日掺和到一起，就成了这么个垃圾。好莱坞的灾难片真的是不用再拍了，30年前可能还会感到有些新鲜，如今看看，真的是套路得完全没法看了。永远都是无能的政府加上英雄的主角，然后民科永远提前发现各种灾难，依靠着那么一两个人莫名其妙就拯救了世界。灾难那块随便你填台风/地震/陨石/火山等等。视觉奇观这种，看多了也就这样了哎，成本么还高的吓人。。。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
