Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
一句“你为什么”从片头憋到片尾，可我真的好喜欢这样annaQwQ
“我们再睡一次吧。”
人设有点毁三观，不过很细腻，慢慢品能品出很多很多细腻的感情
唯一有点的是弟弟吃饺子说的一句:你吃吗？
原来是绵矢莉莎的小说啊～她的书总有一种奇奇怪怪但又吸引我读下去的点在。
女二好温柔啊，女一很冲动任性，但她俩在一起好和谐，一个在疯，一个无条件的宠着。
山田杏奈很适合这个路线，到底是改编其实人设都没有立很好，尤其是男主，太纸片了
喜欢女主的眼睛，明明很多光。她们两人接吻的时候好温柔啊！
今年北影节主竞赛片之一。
故事不知道是否改编至韩国电影，片名也不知是否故意蹭阿莫多瓦，既然选择了，就请争气点。 。。观后，改编了，与阿莫多瓦无关。
《关于我妈的一切》还是挺有意义的。看似是在讲母女之间的故事，其实是聚焦于中国女性。一个中国女性，从她结婚那一刻开始，她就要身兼数职。要当别人的妻子，别人的媳妇，别人的妈妈，别人的姐姐……好不容易熬到退休了，结果。李文舫那句“季佩珍不能死啊”。可谓意味深长。一个家庭，不管在经历什么样的困难，只要女主人还在，这个家都可以正常地运转下去，但如果她不在了，哪怕她是回娘家半个月了，这个家都感觉要塌了一样。别笑，很卵家庭就是这样。徐帆这次演得有声有色，她这个角色其实不好拿捏，因为只要稍用力，她可能就把一个妈妈演成了让人讨厌的角色，但她没有，她用力刚刚好。
这部剧是翻拍韩国的《世上最美丽的离别》，特意找了《世上最美丽的离别》补习了一遍，感觉国人的这部影片就善良得多了，没有去拍病有多痛，甚至没有原版里的女主要杀死婆婆的那一刹那。
怪怪的故事但是很喜欢🥰喜欢爱酱，喜欢美雪，我们再做一次吧。
今年北影节主竞赛片之一。
剧情，人设，我都难于理解，最后一幕“我们再睡一次吧”是he？我只知道我看完后骂了句wc！所有人都值得被拯救？那美雪就该被伤害？床戏凑合，总之我不李姐
忘记标记看过了……印象最深刻的是最后一句以及女主的眼神戏。
上海的医院都不长这样，北京的医院更不可能长这样
妈妈的控制欲过于强了 有点窒息…但是我还是哭得要死 小美真美
党员活动，国庆的时候看过长津湖了，就换了看这场。看完回家我问我妈“当妈妈是得了什么好处？我觉得我又挣不了大钱，三十岁了也不想结婚，对你也一般吧，反倒是一直在受父母恩惠”，我妈也没说啥，晚上她过来给我送豆包花卷，我帮她处理下网上的退货，等她走，沙发上是她帮我从阳台上收好叠好的衣服。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
