Min Ji-suk runs a "ticket bar"where customers can purchase tickets for certain "services"in the town of Sokcho in Gangwon-do. She hires Miss Yang (Ahn So-young), Miss Hong (Lee Hye-young), and Se-young (Jeon Se-young) through the employment agency. Miss Yang and Miss Hong, who are well experienced in this type of business, are used to accepting propositions from customers. But Se-young, who is dating a college student named Min-su, rejects all requests for sexual favors. When Min-su professes to having problems with his tuition and finances, Se-young reassures him that she will procure the necessary funds for him. When the bar's clientele begins to dwindle because of Se-young, Ji-suk reprimands her severely. Se-young develops a close relationship with a Captain Pak and even allows him to sleep with her. She asks Captain Pak to find Min-su employment on a boat, but when Min-su comes to Sokcho for his new job, he sees how Se-young has been making her living. Shocked, he turns his back on the job and leaves. When he eventually returns to Sokcho, he scathingly denounces Se-young's morality and severs their relationship. Decades ago, Ji-suk had stumbled into the bar business in a desperate effort to support her husband, who was serving time in prison; she later left him voluntarily out of shame and moral degradation. Concerned that Se-young will end up with the same fate, Ji-suk asks Min-su to meet with her. She begs him not to abandon Se-young, but he flatly refuses. Ji-suk reacts by pushing Min-su into the sea, and suffers a mental breakdown that lands her in a psychiatric institution.
大选在即，“预告”的信息量又是如此丰富。历史总是相似而不惊人。《芝加哥七君子审判》应运而生，全世界都在看⋯⋯吗？
几位主演的表现都可圈可点，开场几分钟就构建好了被主审的五位的人物弧度。最令人印象深刻的是里朗斯扮演的辩护律师，预定奥斯卡最佳男配角提名。
我觉得索金变了，这种变化很微妙，甚至有可能仅仅是小雀斑和拜伦科恩的个人风格带来的改变，但这部真的终于不再那么那么那么的索金了。他拍电影有点匠心，也有点匠气，可他对他的祖国终保有一颗赤子之心，让人看了总不禁热血沸腾，肃然起敬。
金句频出啊，像「我对政府的蔑视，和它对我的蔑视相比不值一提」这种台词就是为了被人摘进短评里而存在的。
以前反战，现在反川，以后反呼吸，美国因为能容许这些人蹦跶而美
教科书级别的剪辑，以及这一大票演员的出色演出
对于这段历史不了解，但整个影片发展到后期令人热血沸腾，是那种压抑后的热泪盈眶~
我港的废青看完估计只关注到了思想犯罪而忽略了行为暴力了吧。
这才是好的故事。水银泻地般铺开，又能紧紧地收住。好像网飞挺擅长这招的。
工工整整的本子，基于还原历史真实事件的剧本很不好写，何况律政题材要尽量贴近乏味现实更难驾驭。能做到呈现出来这样的结构，加上凌厉剪辑锦上添花。艾伦索金发挥了多年优秀编剧沉淀下来的经验，交足一个功课——有些影片，社会意义大于影片本身。
所有政权都怕名单
奈飞在美国大选期间推出的60年代著名历史事件改编的政治法庭戏，挺有意思。人类现代社会是需要法律的，法律也是在不断地实践、反思、辩论、修正中进步。所以能拍、能看到这样题材之影片，很有意义。
This is not only the history but also the world we’re living in.
过于紧绷，努力地为情绪制造出口，宣讲也可以如此不坦率。缺少合适的指挥家，所谓乐谱不过是一沓又一沓无用的纸张。
节奏非常好 最后一场戏的余味让我这两天跑步一直在想
“Do you have contempt for your government? (你是否蔑视你的政府)” - "It's nothing compared to the contempt my government has for me.(与我的政府对我的蔑视相比, 我的蔑视不值一提)”
美国的法律体系根本不完善，政治的干预性还是很强，所谓的自由国度也只是自由的幻影，可以言论自由，示威自由，自由还是有政府所赋予的，那样就无法称之为自由。发生在美国60年代的事情在当今的中国仍然在演绎着，美国还有改变政府的机会，而我国没有，相比是更加可悲的。
【A】开场便让我欲罢不能，通过台词与剪辑制造的行为反差/思想对立来营造能量，该手段反复而密集的使用，却从不让人感到厌烦。于是情绪在电影标题出来之前都从未止歇，裹挟着超凡的气势冲向第一个高潮。接下来的段落里，剪辑依旧是不弱于剧本的存在，事件的再现/回忆/叙述，多视角台词的重复/反差，观感逐层提升，情绪随之激昂。尽管匠气而工整，却依然有效。个人观点是，不该拒绝这样一部以编剧为主导的「辩论电影」，哪怕高超的剪辑与精致的文本依旧无法掩盖摄影调度上的平庸。但观点与口号仍然具有价值，既然有赋予画面多义性的必要，那也必然有定义画面唯一性的选择，尤其是这样一个时代，此种观点更值得被呐喊。
影片结束看到了导演瞬间“恍然大悟”，索金大大的快节奏及嘴炮永远不会让人失望。拿历史的事情来表现历史重演也是非常有讽刺意味了。
总体中上，剪辑凌乱，输入密集，想要表达的太多太多了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
