Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
不出意外的话 我以后都见不到他了
最好的前任就要像死了一样 不要再打扰对方的生活
我买了张票一个人去跨年的那场/纯纯就是为了磕CP，最后触景生情哭了意思一下，但剧情简单真的还没后来的我们好（虽然那两人有点病）而且男主有女朋友我真的磕不下去了
就很普通，普通的优点，普通的缺点，太普通了，普通中的普通
3.5 意外觉得不错，虽然电视剧质感强烈，感受到的气息是真挚的，被触到了
真的太尬了，杨玏台词稀碎。毛晓彤哭起来也挺美。但这剧情真的太糟糕了！
海报可以改改喜庆点。虽然注水，但是就当三十而已的番外看看。
再美好的爱情也抵不过琐碎生活，最精彩的部分是把生活的艰辛揉碎了给你看，猜疑与不解吞噬了爱情的信任，最终走向分崩离析。可惜最后破镜重圆虽有感动，但又带有爱情童话故事一般，不太真实。
平平无奇的“平民”爱情故事。
最后两个人面对面坐着 只说一句“我想吃火锅了”不知道为什么突然被戳到泪点
1.2 怎么说呢有些可能真实 但有些很不太行 说这前任就应该死了一样 但是见面没多久又复合了 恋爱中应该很少这样吧 跟我对象去看 他觉得男的是对的 女的是错的 我跟他相反 我理解女生 男的有些也是有问题的 差点吵起来 我笑了
私以为朋友圈随机抽取一人所讲述的爱情故事都会比这剧本精彩
谈恋爱时要的仪式感，别人看着做作，自己觉得很甜。分手时丢失的安全感，自己天都塌了，别人说句至于吗？
还是很喜欢演员们的~ 俩人再度合作，这个CP可以磕。主要情节就是，一年好了，一年不好了，又一年好了，所以是以年为单位么。。。。里面很多情节都是日常情侣所经历的，也算是比较真实，也没有过于矫情，还凑合；结尾升华了一点点，也算是对爱情的美好期待和祝愿。毛晓彤好美，真得好美，我一个女的都拔不开眼。。。
虽然本片挑对了男女主角 对现代都市爱情的许多元素拿捏的也还算准确 但剧本是真的要好好琢磨一下 这种编剧水平最多放在二流的电视剧当中还是有相当多的粉丝会追下去 并且有消耗毛晓彤故事和形象的嫌疑 底子打的还可以但后面的剧情矛盾和起伏就全靠想当然 结局也是生搬硬套
剧情老套，毫无新意，无感，还有能不能少点鸡汤
非常纯粹的爱情片，在一起和分手的原因也很老套，但是因为毛晓彤这个甜妹，我还是看完了，她真的好灵气好可爱
4星。很不错的电影啊剧本节奏制作还有男女主都很舒服，怎么评分这么低。人类悲喜还真的相通，前半部分真的典型，估计男女恋爱都这样。后半部分扯了结婚也是怨偶。
看的我蛮感同身受的 所以说女生也要自己忙起来 关怀自己是永远不会错的
我是听了一场MV。谢谢你，石景山的66M，在2021年的日子里你是我的主语。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
